4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:46:36Consent roll call with items M1, M2, M3, M4, M5 (memorialization of resolutions; not an item on the agenda). Roll call read by staff from 'Acting Vice Chair Concordant' (2:46:39; recorded as Gangadin). Gangadin (p 0.90), Wick, Stamato and Patel (p 1.00) 'Aye' in the full pass. Chairman Langston answered 'Aye.' (2:46:46, p 0.82, re-transcription of 9980-10029 s only) but is recorded not-voting: Langston was not eligible, because the vote table of RESO P2023-0107 (decided October 7, 2025) lists Gangadin, Torres, Lipski, Stamato, Patel, Wick and Lewis voting and does not list Langston (EDITORIAL.md section 4, eligibility, rule A); no certification of the hearing transcript was heard. 'Motion carries on in favor to memorialize resolutions' (2:46:46). Held for Adam: EDITORIAL.md section 4 says an ineligible member's not-voting does not hold a memorialization roll call, but tools/validate.py refuses to publish one with a member not-voting. Resolution memorialized: RESO P2023-0107 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0d491d34-d8f4-4ec2-a809-b99f72663e0f?tab=attachments), 'Memorialized on January 13, 2026', 'Corrective Resolution Memorialized on January 27, 2026'; its vote table (7-0) is the hearing's roll call, not this one.
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:12:18Consent roll call with items M1 to M7 (agenda item 21, memorialization of resolutions). Roll call read by staff from 'Acting Vice Chair Congradin' (3:12:18; recorded as Gangadin); every answer heard, p 0.87 to 1.00. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (3:12:26). Rests on the full pass. Eligibility: RESO P2023-0107 (corrective) on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0d491d34-d8f4-4ec2-a809-b99f72663e0f?tab=attachments) gives 'Decided on Tuesday October 7, 2025', memorialized January 13, 2026, corrective resolution memorialized January 27, 2026; its vote table (7-0) lists Gangadin, Torres, Lipski, Stamato, Patel, Wick and Lewis and not Langston. Langston answered 'Aye' (3:12:26, p 1.00) but is recorded not-voting because the hearing's vote table does not list him (EDITORIAL.md section 4, eligibility, rule A); no record of the October 7, 2025 hearing or of a certification is in this repository; published on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20 (needs_checking entry, resolved).