Jersey City Minutes

Project or ordinance

Minor Subdivision with “c” Variance, 183-193 Bayview Ave

Status
Memorialized as of March 31, 2026 · 2026-03-31 3:12:50
Body
Planning Board
Numbers
P2025-0258
Kind
subdivision
Plan or zone
Jackson Hill Redevelopment Plan
Parcel
183-193 Bayview Ave, Block 24001, Lot 1, 2, Ward F · source, p. 13
Applicant
183 Bayview SPE JCP001 LLC · source, p. 13
Attorney
Charles Harrington, Esq. · source, p. 13
Planner
Ben Jordan · source, p. 13

Hearings and votes

Planning Board, March 24, 2026

Item 30 · carried · Carried · 0:03:57

Planning Board, March 31, 2026

Item 18 · hearing · Approved · 2:16:25
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:38:18
Voted before item 17, at the applicant's attorney's suggestion that the subdivision be voted first (2:18:03). Motion 'on case P2025-0258 as presented to the board with all staff recommendations and conditions' (9485.6-9495.9 s); 'Second it' (9496.5 s); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Commissioner Wick' (9498.4 s): Wick 'Aye' (9499.3 s, p 0.08 in the full pass; 'Aye.' 9499.6 s, p 0.98 in the re-transcription without VAD of 9480-9530 s); Stamato 'Aye' (9501.5 s, p 0.90); Kaplan 'Great project' 'Aye' (9504.1 s, p 0.54; 0.99 re-transcription); Patel 'Aye' (9505.6 s, p 0.97). The full pass has no words from 9505.6 s to 9513.4 s; the re-transcription hears 'And Acting Chair Gongadin' (9507.6 s) 'Aye' (9508.0 s, p 0.61) and 'Motion carries, all in favor with conditions' (9508.2 s). Wick's and Gangadin's answers rest on the re-transcription; no count announced. Held: RESO P2025-0258 marks Langston and Gonzalez as abstaining, where the video has them absent (see needs_checking). The resolution (RESO P2025-0258) prints 'VOTE: 5-0-0' with the same five yes but marks Langston and Gonzalez, absent from the meeting, as abstaining. Published as heard on Adam Hanford's review of 2026-10-20.

Planning Board, March 31, 2026

Item 22.1 · memorialization · Memorialized · 3:09:14
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:12:50
One roll call on 8 resolutions (item 22), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Apply rule A per resolution'. Every member who answered voted at the hearing. Roll call as heard: RESO P2025-0258 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/a533ccaa-8516-4702-b7ed-3529e5f81e32?tab=attachments), RESO P2025-0226 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/b2acb690-ecf3-4136-81f3-6f249740df29?tab=attachments), RESO P2025-0073 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/54adfdce-9c81-4af8-ac68-10904f29584f?tab=attachments) and RESO P2025-0198 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/71ebe4f1-d730-47c7-9fb7-a27fc83a165b?tab=attachments) print date of memorialization March 31, 2026. One roll call on eight resolutions read by a speaker not named ('We have eight resolutions', 3:09:48). 'Can I get a second? Second.' (11566.2-11567.5 s); 'Second.' (11569.5 s); mover and seconder not named. Roll call 'on a motion to approve the resolutions' from Commissioner Wick (11572.0 s): Wick, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Gangadin each 'Aye.' (11573.0-11578.2 s, p 0.99-1.00). 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (11578.5 s); no count announced. Every answer heard; eligibility applied per resolution (rule A) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20.

Documents