5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:13:21 as heard, unconfirmedAs heard, unconfirmed: tools/resolutions.py found no resolution of this case uploaded since 2026-03-31. Answers' word confidence: Wick 0.54, Stamato 0.98, Kaplan 1.00, Patel 0.99, Gangadin 1.00. Motion to approve 'as presented to the board this evening with all staff recommendations and conditions including the 190 days' (0:13:06); 'Second' (0:13:19); mover and seconder not named. Roll call 'on a motion to approve' from Commissioner Wick (0:13:21): Wick, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Gangadin each 'Aye' (0:13:24-0:13:30). 'Motion carries all in favor with conditions' (0:13:31); no count announced.
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:41:22Consent roll call with items 20.1 to 20.7 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 20, read 3:38:49 to 3:41:20 by a reader not named). 'Can I get a second?' (3:41:20); 'Second, I got a motion to Memorialize Resolutions' (3:41:22); no motion heard apart from the reading; mover and seconder not named. The answers rest on the full pass and the re-transcription without VAD of 3:41:22 to 3:42:00 (word timings). Roll call from 'Vice Chair Wick' (3:41:26): Wick 'Aye' (3:41:27; p 0.46 full pass, 0.99 re-transcription): aye as heard in the re-transcription. Conaway 'Aye' (3:41:30; p 0.96, 1.00). The full pass has a further 'Aye.' (3:41:31, p 0.68) with no name before it, absent from the re-transcription; not credited. Kaplan, Capers, Stamato and Patel 'Aye.' (3:41:32 to 3:41:37, p 1.00 in both passes). Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gangadin' (3:41:38): no answer in the full pass before 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions' (3:41:39); 'Aye.' (3:41:39, p 0.99) in the re-transcription: aye as heard in the re-transcription. No count announced. Heard: 7 ayes. Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 20.1). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-08 (resolutions run 2026-10-17). Reading as heard (recorded): 7-0. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. Not eligible (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A): Conaway, not on the board at the 2026-03-31 hearing; Capers, not on the board at the 2026-03-31 hearing. Each answered aye here and is recorded not-voting. Decided at the hearing of 2026-03-31 (planning-2026-03-31, item 7d). Applied on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-21; recorded 7-0 as heard before.