Jersey City Minutes

Project or ordinance

One-Year Extension, 212 –230 Culver Ave

Status
Memorialized as of September 29, 2026 · 2026-09-29 4:37:42
Body
Planning Board
Numbers
P2026-0104
Kind
site plan
Plan or zone
Route 440 – Culver Redevelopment Plan, Mid-Rise B District
Parcel
212 –230 Culver Ave, Block 21701, Lot 18, 19.01, Ward B · source, p. 2
Applicant
Culver Holdings LP · source, p. 2
Attorney
James McCann, Esq. · source, p. 2
Planner
Sophia E. Pereira, AICP · source, p. 2

Hearings and votes

Planning Board, September 8, 2026

Item 8 · hearing · Approved · 0:03:17
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:07:31
Roll call read by the secretary 'on a motion to approve' from 'Vice Chair Wick.' (0:07:36, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2026-0104 as presented to the board this evening with all original conditions' (0:07:25 to 0:07:31); mover not named and no second heard. Wick, Conaway, Capers, Stamato, Patel and Gangadin 'Aye.' (0:07:37 to 0:07:46, p 0.99 to 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor with conditions.' (0:07:46). No count announced. Kaplan had not yet arrived (noted at 0:44:41). Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-08 (resolutions run 2026-10-17): as heard, unconfirmed. The resolution prints 'VOTE: 5-0' and does not list Commissioner Stamato, heard 'Aye' on the video (0:07:43); it also prints 'DATE OF HEARING: September 10, 2026' for this September 8 meeting. Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-09-08__8).

Planning Board, September 29, 2026

Item 17.11 · memorialization · Memorialized · 4:36:50
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 4:37:42
Consent roll call with items 17.1 to 17.13 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 17; 13 resolutions read 4:33:28 to 4:37:40 by a reader not named, 'we have 13 resolutions here this evening', 4:33:25). No motion heard apart from the reading; 'Do I have a second? Second.' (4:37:42 to 4:37:45, p 0.96); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair Patel?' (4:37:48, word timing): Patel 'Aye.' (4:37:49); Conaway 'Aye.' (4:37:51); Stamato 'Aye.' (4:37:52); Capers 'Aye.' (4:37:54); Kaplan 'Aye.' (4:37:55); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Congaden?' (4:37:56), 'Aye.' (4:37:57); every answer at p 1.00. 'Motion carries.' (4:37:57). No count announced. Heard: 6 ayes. Wick, Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 17.1). RESO P2026-0104 (EnerGov, uploaded 2026-10-21, https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/2a954613-a572-4f29-8168-4f6f1cf37751?tab=attachments) prints 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: September 29, 2026' (last page): memorialized at this meeting. Its vote table (5-0: Gangadin, Wick, Patel, Capers, Conaway yes) is the hearing's roll call, not a second record of this one; it prints 'DATE OF HEARING: September 10, 2026' and does not list Stamato, where the video of September 8, 2026 has Wick, Conaway, Capers, Stamato, Patel and Gangadin aye (planning-2026-09-08 item 8); eligibility is read from the video (EDITORIAL.md section 4). Eligibility: heard September 8, 2026 (planning-2026-09-08 item 8, 6-0, unconfirmed): Conaway, Capers, Stamato, Patel and Gangadin aye; Kaplan had not yet arrived (absent), and no certification heard. Kaplan answered aye here. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-09-08 item 8 (Approved 6-0, t 0:07:31)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-09-08 item 8 (Approved 6-0, t 0:07:31) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.

Documents