Jersey City Minutes

Project or ordinance

Review and discussion of the “Report Concerning Determination of the Hudson County Plaza Study Area as an area in need of redevelopment…

Status
Memorialized as of September 29, 2026 · 2026-09-29 4:37:42
Body
Planning Board
Numbers
P2026-0134
Kind
redevelopment study

Hearings and votes

Planning Board, September 8, 2026

Item 10 · hearing · Approved · 0:07:31
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:29:31 as heard, unconfirmed
Roll call read by the secretary 'On a motion to approve' from 'Vice Chair Wick' (0:29:33), after a motion 'to recommend the review and discussion of the report concerning determination of the Hudson County Plaza study area as an area in need of redevelopment and more specifically as a non-condemnation redevelopment area authorized by Resolution 25 through 786 in Ward C' (0:29:08); mover not named and no second heard. The answers rest on the full pass and the re-transcription without VAD of 0:29:31 to 0:29:46 (word timings). Wick 'Aye' (0:29:33; p 0.78 full pass, 0.99 re-transcription). Conaway, called at 0:29:35, 'Aye.' (0:29:36, p 1.00) and Capers, called at 0:29:37, 'Aye.' (0:29:38, p 1.00): heard only in the re-transcription (the full pass has nothing from 0:29:34 to 0:29:40): aye as heard in the re-transcription. Stamato 'Aye.' (0:29:40; p 0.82, 1.00); Patel 'Aye.' (0:29:42; p 1.00, 1.00); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gangadin' (0:29:43), 'Aye.' (0:29:44; p 1.00, 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (0:29:45). No count announced. Heard: 6 ayes. Kaplan had not yet arrived. Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). The action is recorded as Approved for the motion to recommend, as for planning-2026-10-13 item 9. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-08 (resolutions run 2026-10-17): as heard, unconfirmed.

Planning Board, September 29, 2026

Item 17.13 · memorialization · Memorialized · 4:37:25
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 4:37:42
Consent roll call with items 17.1 to 17.13 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 17; 13 resolutions read 4:33:28 to 4:37:40 by a reader not named, 'we have 13 resolutions here this evening', 4:33:25). No motion heard apart from the reading; 'Do I have a second? Second.' (4:37:42 to 4:37:45, p 0.96); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair Patel?' (4:37:48, word timing): Patel 'Aye.' (4:37:49); Conaway 'Aye.' (4:37:51); Stamato 'Aye.' (4:37:52); Capers 'Aye.' (4:37:54); Kaplan 'Aye.' (4:37:55); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Congaden?' (4:37:56), 'Aye.' (4:37:57); every answer at p 1.00. 'Motion carries.' (4:37:57). No count announced. Heard: 6 ayes. Wick, Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 17.1). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-29 (resolutions run 2026-10-17). Eligibility: recommended September 8, 2026 (planning-2026-09-08 item 10, 6-0, unconfirmed): Conaway, Capers, Stamato, Patel and Gangadin aye; Kaplan had not yet arrived (absent), and no certification heard. Kaplan answered aye here. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-09-08 item 10 (Approved 6-0, t 0:29:31)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-09-08 item 10 (Approved 6-0, t 0:29:31) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.

Documents