6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:45:38 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Acting Vice Chair Stamato?' (1:45:45). Commissioner Conaway's 'Yes' (1:45:50), faint on the automatic transcript, was confirmed by listening on 2026-10-18. The secretary announced Commissioner Patel's recusal (1:46:02) and 'Motion carries, five in favor, one recuse'; the video has six members voting in favor. No reason for the recusal was stated. Mover and seconder not named. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. No memorialized resolution of this hearing yet, so the vote shows as heard, unconfirmed (EDITORIAL.md section 4).
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:14:11Times in this note are word timings. Consent roll call with items 36.1 to 36.8 (eight resolutions read 5:11:09 to 5:14:02). No motion heard apart from the reading; 'Can we get a second? Second.' (5:14:07 to 5:14:09, p 0.99), speaker not named. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby,' (5:14:11): no answer heard in either pass; 'come back.' (5:14:17); Kaplan 'Aye.' (5:14:19, p 0.99); Little, called as 'Councilperson Alana Little.' (5:14:21), 'Aye.' (5:14:23, p 1.00); Conaway 'aye,' (5:14:26; p 0.57 full pass, 1.00 re-transcription); Capers 'aye,' (5:14:28, p 0.99); Stamato 'aye,' (5:14:30, p 1.00); Barnaby, called again (5:14:32): no answer in the full pass, 'Aye.' (5:14:33) at p 0.99 in the re-transcription without VAD of 5:14:04 to 5:14:47: aye as heard in the re-transcription; Wick 'aye,' (5:14:37, p 0.99); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gungadin,' (5:14:39), 'aye,' (5:14:40, p 1.00). Heard: 8 ayes. Announced: 'okay, seven commissioners voting in favor, one absent.' (5:14:41 to 5:14:44), one aye fewer than heard. Patel absent. Barnaby, called at 5:14:16 ('Come back') and again at 5:14:32, is recorded absent on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18, with the secretary's count 'seven commissioners voting in favor, one absent' (5:14:44); the re-transcription's 'Aye' after the second call is not attributed to Barnaby. Wick answered aye and Kaplan answered aye, but both were absent at the July 14 hearing of the case and no certification is heard: not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting (rule A). Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 13 (Approved 6-0, roll call at 1:45:38, Conaway's yes confirmed by Adam Hanford on listening, 2026-10-18), the hearing named in the reading ('decided on July 14, 2026', 5:13:27). Case P20-168 is not on the EnerGov portal (searched again 2026-10-18 by number, address and applicant; legacy cases such as P20-064 are listed, this one is not), so no resolution's vote table exists to compare. Published 5-0 on Adam Hanford's instruction of 2026-10-18.