Meeting record
Planning Board, July 14, 2026
- Body
- Planning Board
- Date
- July 14, 2026 (regular meeting)
- Video
- city recording, 5h 32m
- Called to order
- 0:00:00 (5:35 p.m.)
- Adjourned
- 5:32:16
- Agenda
- data.jerseycitynj.gov
- Memorialized resolutions
- jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net
- Votes
- 8 confirmed, 10 as heard, unconfirmed
The Planning Board publishes no written minutes, so the votes and attendance on this page are as heard on the video and are marked unconfirmed until a memorialized resolution confirms them (see the
vote rule).
Attendance
Items
7c P2026-0064 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:07 (agenda page 7, old business item c): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to July 28, 2026 (0:03:19). The speaker is not named. No motion or vote was heard.
10 P2025-0125 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:30 (agenda page 8, item 10): the petitioner requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 11, 2026 (0:03:39). The speaker is not named. The amendments were not presented or discussed at this meeting and the board made no recommendation on them; no motion or vote was heard. The case is not mentioned again on the video.
24 P2025-0172 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:44 (agenda page 12, item 24): the applicant requested to carry to July 28, 2026; the speaker said no notice is required (0:04:04). Case number confirmed at 0:04:14 to 0:04:18. No motion or vote was heard.
25 P2026-0023 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:04:18 (agenda item 25): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026. No motion or vote was heard.
26 P2024-0008 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:04:37 (agenda item 26): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026. No motion or vote was heard.
29 P2025-0169 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:05:00 (agenda page 14, item 29) as the last item to be carried: the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to July 28, 2026. No motion or vote was heard. Asked whether item 27 was carried, the speaker said items 27 and 28 were not requesting a carry (0:05:32).
6 other
Cases listed on the agenda as already carried (items 6a to 6u)
Listed on the agenda (pp. 2 to 6) as carried; not read on the video, which moved past them at 0:06:30. Cases: 6a P2025-0099; 6b P2026-0025; 6c P2025-0138; 6d P2025-0239; 6e P2025-0240; 6f P2025-0186; 6g P2025-0246; 6h P2026-0047; 6i P2025-0253; 6j P2024-0099; 6k P2026-0018; 6l P2025-0106; 6m P2024-0240; 6n P23-073; 6o (no case number); 6p P2026-0013; 6q P2025-0257; 6r P2025-0244; 6s P23-043; 6t P2025-0068; 6u P2025-0133. Agenda: https://data.jerseycitynj.gov/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/planning-board-agendas-2026/attachments/15_july_14_2026_mtgpdf
7a P2026-0094 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:11:19 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby' (0:11:22, word timing); every answer heard (p 0.95 to 1.00; a second 'Aye.' after Patel's at 0:11:36 is at p 0.21). 'Motion carries all in favor.' (0:11:47). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named.
- 0:06:47 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application seeks a second one-year extension of a preliminary site plan approval for three towers in the Newport Redevelopment Plan area, extending the vesting period to July 26, 2027 (0:08:32).
- 0:10:10 Staff: Staff recommended approval provided the applicant continues to comply with the conditions of the original approval; the applicant's attorney agreed.
Old business item a, called at 0:06:30. Public portion opened at 0:09:48; no member of the public spoke; closed at 0:10:06.
7b P2026-0062 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:19:42 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby' (0:19:46, word timing). Conaway's 'Aye.' (0:19:54, p 1.00) and Barnaby's 'Aye.' (0:19:47, p 0.99) are from the re-transcription without VAD of 0:19:30 to 0:20:15; the full pass has no answer from Conaway and Barnaby's at p 0.46. Stamato: 'I vote, aye' (0:20:15). 'Motion carries all in favor.' (0:20:21). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named.
- 0:14:35 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the applicant seeks another three-year extension of the 2020 interim use approval for a mobile concrete batching plant, from June 9, 2026 to June 8, 2029, with no changes to the 2020 interim use site plan (0:16:10).
- 0:18:13 Staff: Staff said the redevelopment plan lets the board set interim uses and their duration, that the site has virtually no adjacent residential units, that dust mitigation continues under the conditions, and recommended approval.
Old business item b, called at 0:11:36. Affidavit of service marked A1 (0:14:53). Public portion opened and closed within the 0:17:37 segment; no member of the public spoke.
9 other
Review and discussion of Certified Artist Yazmin Atmore. Formal action may be taken.
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:21:32 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby' (0:21:32); Commissioners Barnaby, Conaway and Stamato gave their answers with comments. Chair Gangadin's answer (0:22:01), faint on the automatic transcript, was confirmed as aye by listening on 2026-10-18. 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (0:22:07); no count announced. Mover and seconder not named. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. No memorialized resolution of this hearing yet, so the vote shows as heard, unconfirmed (EDITORIAL.md section 4).
- 0:20:31 Staff: Staff said the artist met criteria one through five for the certified artist housing lotteries and recommended approving the certification.
New business item 9, called at 0:20:25. Public portion opened at 0:21:08; no member of the public spoke; closed at 0:21:22.
11 P2026-0070 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:32:17 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Stamato?' (0:32:17, word timing); every answer heard (p 0.98 to 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (0:32:36). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named.
- 0:23:47 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said Lot 13 in Block 11401 would be divided into Lot 13.02 on Newark Avenue, to remain vacant, and Lot 13.01 at 253 First Street, the city-operated parking lot, with a variance for each lot's size.
- 0:29:52 Applicant: The applicant's surveyor said the resulting lots would be 7,500 square feet (Lot 13.01) and 2,462 square feet (Lot 13.02).
- 0:31:18 Staff: Staff said the subdivision supports the redevelopment plan's objective for the surface parking area and recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff memo dated July 7, 2026; the applicant agreed.
Called at 0:22:11. Notices marked A1 (0:23:19). Public portion opened at 0:30:55; no member of the public spoke; closed at 0:31:14.
12 P2024-0244 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:59:13Roll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (0:59:13); every answer heard. Little was called three times ('Commissioner Little?', 'Councilman Little?', 'Councilperson Little?') before answering 'Aye.' (0:59:26). Gangadin's name is transcribed 'John McGinn' (0:59:41); 'Aye' at p 0.90. Secretary: 'Motion carries 7-0' (0:59:42). The chair called on 'Vice Chair?' (0:58:34) and the mover was told 'Pat, you're on mute' (0:58:45) before moving at 0:58:48; mover and seconder not recorded by name. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2024-0244 on EnerGov (decided July 14, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'Vote: 7- 0', p. 5). The resolution's vote table does not list Vice Chair Wick and Commissioner Kaplan; absent as heard on the video.
- 0:36:05 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the project is a four-storey building with 15 units on a through lot between Newark Avenue and Columbus Drive in the Newark Avenue Downtown Redevelopment Plan, with no variances.
- 0:40:05 Applicant: The applicant's architect said the building has about 4,000 square feet of ground-floor retail and 15 units: three one-bedroom, nine two-bedroom and three three-bedroom.
- 0:53:29 Patrick Stamato: Asked that commercial and residential trash be kept separate; the applicant's attorney agreed.
- 0:57:48 Staff: Staff proposed a condition that the commercial and residential uses have separate trash pickup points, confirmed the applicant accepted the conditions in the staff memo dated July 14, and recommended approval.
Called at 0:32:47. Notices marked A1 (0:33:29); presentation marked A2 (0:37:39). The application waited briefly while the architect was brought into the meeting (0:34:07 to 0:35:44). Public portion opened at 0:56:38; no member of the public spoke; closed at 0:56:56.
13 P20-168 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:45:38 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Acting Vice Chair Stamato?' (1:45:45). Commissioner Conaway's 'Yes' (1:45:50), faint on the automatic transcript, was confirmed by listening on 2026-10-18. The secretary announced Commissioner Patel's recusal (1:46:02) and 'Motion carries, five in favor, one recuse'; the video has six members voting in favor. No reason for the recusal was stated. Mover and seconder not named. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. No memorialized resolution of this hearing yet, so the vote shows as heard, unconfirmed (EDITORIAL.md section 4).
- 1:00:42 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the project in Zone 4 of the Journal Square 2060 Redevelopment Plan is a tower with 584 units, 45 parking spaces, retail and office space under the plan's bonuses, with a few design deviations.
- 1:28:26 Irene Barnaby: Asked whether the building is required to provide affordable units; the applicant said none are required, and staff said the application predates the Journal Square affordable housing amendment (1:29:04).
- 1:30:51 Eleana Little: Asked whether the applicant would install curb bump-outs at the intersection as a condition; the applicant's attorney agreed to coordinate with the Division of Transportation Planning (1:31:32).
- 1:35:48 Samuel Conaway III: Asked whether the automated parking system would run on a backup generator in a power outage; the applicant agreed it could be connected to the generator for emergency retrieval of vehicles (1:37:07).
- 1:43:31 Staff: Staff recommended approval subject to the seven conditions in the staff memo and the conditions added at the hearing: the parking system on the backup generator, exploring curb bump-outs, and a balcony rail gap of no more than two inches (1:44:49).
Called at 0:59:47. Notices marked A1 (1:01:44); presentation (19 pages, dated 5-26-26) marked A2 (1:03:18). Public portion opened at 1:43:07; no member of the public spoke; closed at 1:43:27. After the vote the board took a ten-minute break ('we'll be back at 730', 1:45:50 to 1:46:26) and was called back to order within the 1:46:26 segment; no recess motion was heard.
14 P2025-0032 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:47:24 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Acting Vice Chair, Stamato' (2:47:24). Commissioner Little's aye (2:47:37), heard on the automatic transcript with no name called before it, was confirmed by listening on 2026-10-18. Chair Gangadin's name is transcribed 'Downey' (2:47:45). The secretary announced 'Motion carries 7-0' (2:47:47). Mover and seconder not named. No resolution of this case had been posted as of 2026-10-16. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. No memorialized resolution of this hearing yet, so the vote shows as heard, unconfirmed (EDITORIAL.md section 4).
- 2:00:10 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the project is a five-storey building with 30 units and ground-floor commercial space in the NC zone, three of the units affordable, needing two 'c' variances, for height and for the rear yard setback.
- 2:19:27 Samuel Conaway III: Asked how many units are affordable; the applicant said three, one each at moderate, low and very low income (2:19:38).
- 2:23:52 Eleana Little: Asked about the bedroom mix of the affordable units, the striping where the traffic signal support moves, curb extensions and green roof maintenance; the applicant agreed to coordinate on curb extensions (2:25:50).
- 2:28:19 Bhavin Patel: Asked whether the bike storage could be relocated so that it is not reached through the trash room; the applicant agreed to work with staff on it (2:29:57).
- 2:45:45 Staff: Staff added three standard affordable housing conditions and recommended approval; the applicant's attorney accepted ten conditions in total (2:46:42).
Called at 1:58:52, after the board was called back to order (1:46:26 segment). Notices marked A1 (1:59:30). Public portion opened at 2:44:23; no member of the public spoke; closed at 2:44:33.
15 P2025-0116 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:05:30 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (3:05:31, word timing); every answer heard (p 0.98 to 1.00; a second 'Aye.' after Patel's at 3:05:46 is at p 0.15). 'Okay, motion carries. All in favor to approve the minor subdivision.' (3:05:56). No count announced. First of three roll calls on the Neptune Avenue applications (items 15, 16, 17). Mover and seconder not named.
- 2:50:44 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said planning staff had recommended two driveways rather than one for these lots, and that this is the deviation sought on the subdivision and the site plans.
- 3:02:58 Staff: Staff said the city prefers shared driveways to keep on-street parking, but two curb cuts make sense on these lots, agreed with the planner's testimony on the variances and recommended approval with the conditions in the staff memo; the applicant accepted them (3:04:44).
Called at 2:47:57. At the board attorney's suggestion items 15, 16 and 17 were heard together (2:49:21; items 16 and 17 called at 2:50:06), with notices for all three marked A1 (2:50:19), and voted separately (3:04:49). Public portion opened at 3:02:30; no member of the public spoke; closed at 3:02:53.
16 P2025-0017 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:06:26 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (3:06:27, word timing), immediately after item 15's; every answer heard (p 0.85 to 1.00). 'Motion carries all in favor with conditions.' Moved 'with planning staff conditions' (3:05:46 segment). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named.
Called with items 15 and 17 at 2:50:06 and heard together with them (see item 15).
17 P2025-0018 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:07:18 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (3:07:18); every answer heard (p 0.79 to 1.00). 'Motion carries all in favor with conditions.' (3:07:42). Moved 'with play board conditions' (3:06:58). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named.
Called with items 15 and 16 at 2:50:06 and heard together with them (see item 15).
28 P2025-0270 case
After item 17's vote the applicant's attorney asked whether item 28 could be carried (3:07:38); staff said it would be carried with preservation of notice to the August 25, 2026 meeting (3:07:59). No motion or vote was heard. The application had been named at 0:05:32 as not requesting a carry.
19 P2025-0241 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:24Roll call read by the secretary from 'Acting Vice Chair Stamato?' (3:27:24 line). The re-transcription without VAD of 3:27:10 to 3:28:00 hears the roll call interrupted for a second ('We need a second ... Second.', 3:27:29 to 3:27:35) and resumed at 'Acting Vice Chair, Stamato' (3:27:38). Stamato: 'Yes.' (3:27:40, p 0.89 full pass). Conaway's 'Aye.' (3:27:46) is at p 1.00 in the re-transcription (p 0.02 in the full pass); every other answer at p 0.91 to 1.00. 'Motion for the subdivision carries all in favor.' (3:28:00). No count announced. The motion first named both cases (3:27:00); separate votes were taken (3:27:09). Mover and seconder not named. Second record: the joint memorialized resolution of P2025-0241 and P2025-0242 on EnerGov (decided July 14, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'Result: Approved 7-0', p. 4). The resolution's vote list does not name Vice Chair Wick and Commissioner Kaplan; absent as heard on the video.
- 3:10:52 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application divides Block 6601, Lot 36 into two conforming lots, each with a new three-family building and an accessory dwelling unit, with no variances.
- 3:25:47 Staff: Staff said the subdivision and site plan conform, with no variances, noted the design's use of the R-1 contextual design standards, and recommended approval with the five conditions in the staff report; the applicant agreed (3:26:02).
Called at 3:09:31 (with item 20 at 3:09:42), after the board agreed at 3:09:12 to hear these two cases before items 21 and 18. Notices marked A1 (3:10:29). Public portion opened at 3:24:30; no member of the public spoke; closed in the 3:25:14 segment.
20 P2025-0242 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:28:29Roll call read by the secretary from 'Acting Vice Chair Stamato?' (3:28:29, word timing), immediately after item 19's; every answer heard (p 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor on the site plan.' (3:28:49). Moved 'with planning board staff conditions' (3:28:19). No count announced. Mover and seconder not named. Second record: the joint memorialized resolution of P2025-0241 and P2025-0242 on EnerGov (decided July 14, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; P2025-0242 'Result: Approved 7-0', p. 4). The resolution's vote list does not name Vice Chair Wick and Commissioner Kaplan; absent as heard on the video.
Called with item 19 and heard together with it (see item 19). After the vote the board took a ten-minute break ('we'll be back at 9.15', 3:29:00) and was called back to order at 3:42:40; no recess motion was heard.
27 P2026-0049 case
After the break the applicant's attorney, who also appears on items 22 and 23, asked that an application they would not reach be adjourned with preservation of notice, naming it as 'number 26 on the agenda' (3:44:07 to 3:45:07); staff then carried item 27, 206 Olean Avenue, case P2026-0049, to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:45:17 to 3:45:28). No motion or vote was heard. Item 26 had already been carried in correspondence (0:04:37).
21 P2025-0137 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 4:30:59 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'acting Vice Chair Stamato' (4:31:02, word timing). Stamato: 'Yes' (p 0.62). Every other answer heard (p 0.83 to 0.99; a second 'Aye' after Little's at 4:31:18 is at p 0.26). Secretary: 'Motion carries 7-0, with conditions' (4:31:27). Mover and seconder not named.
- 3:47:08 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application, in Zone 4 of the Journal Square 2060 Redevelopment Plan, is for a six-storey building with 35 units after the applicant acquired an additional lot, 822 Pavonia.
- 3:50:07 Applicant: The applicant's architect said the two variances are for height, 65 feet where 64 feet is permitted, and the rear yard setback.
- 3:59:21 Unidentified: A commissioner asked about bike parking; the applicant's architect agreed to provide a minimum of 27 bike spaces in place of the 18 shown (4:00:48).
- 4:27:55 Staff: Staff agreed with the planner's analysis of the variances and recommended approval with the six conditions in the staff memo dated May 8, 2026 and the bike rack condition; the applicant's attorney accepted seven conditions (4:30:15).
The applicant's attorney asked at 3:08:52 to hear this application in place of item 18; the board heard items 19 and 20 first. Called at 3:45:59. Notices marked A1 (3:46:32). Public portion opened in the 4:27:09 segment; no member of the public spoke; closed in the same segment.
22 P2025-0184 case
After item 21's vote the chair said the board would not reach the Holland Gardens applications (4:31:54). Staff first proposed August 25, then the board accepted July 28 (4:32:16 to 4:33:25), and staff carried items 22 and 23 together with preservation of notice to July 28, 2026 (4:33:34); both applications are to be heard together (4:34:03), and the date was confirmed at 5:27:50. No motion or vote was heard. The applicant's attorney had been brought into the meeting for these applications at 3:44:07.
23 P2025-0185 case
After item 21's vote the chair said the board would not reach the Holland Gardens applications (4:31:54). Staff first proposed August 25, then the board accepted July 28 (4:32:16 to 4:33:25), and staff carried items 22 and 23 together with preservation of notice to July 28, 2026 (4:33:34); both applications are to be heard together (4:34:03), and the date was confirmed at 5:27:50. No motion or vote was heard. The applicant's attorney had been brought into the meeting for these applications at 3:44:07.
18 P2025-0127 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:27:02Roll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (5:27:02); every answer heard, 7-0. 'Motion carries all in favor with conditions.' (5:27:39); no count announced. Mover and seconder not named. The memorialized resolution of P2025-0127 (decided July 14, 2026; memorialized October 5, 2026; vote table p. 7, no tally printed, seven yes votes counted) lists Vice Chair Wick and Commissioner Kaplan voting yes, whom the video shows absent from this meeting, and does not list Commissioners Capers and Conaway, both heard voting aye. The vote is recorded as heard on the video. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
- 4:35:00 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application is a three-storey two-family house on a flag lot on Waverly Street next to a DOT easement, needing front and rear yard setback, front yard coverage, front yard landscaping and design variances because of the lot's shape.
- 5:19:28 Applicant: In answer to the public comment, the applicant's architect said the living spaces face the front of the property and the bulkhead is placed at the rear so that it does not overlook the neighbouring yard.
- 5:21:11 Staff: Staff asked the applicant to agree to the conditions in the staff memo dated April 27, 2026, said the variances follow from the site's conditions, and recommended approval (5:26:04).
- 5:22:14 Staff: Staff asked whether taller evergreen plantings could be added in the rear yard; the applicant's attorney agreed, as a sixth condition (5:23:25).
- 5:23:57 Eleana Little: Asked for a condition delineating a pedestrian walkway from the area where DOT vehicles are placed; the applicant agreed to differentiate it by colour, as a seventh condition (5:26:04).
First called at 3:08:25; at the applicant's attorney's request (3:08:52) it was deferred and heard from 4:34:13. Notices marked A1 (4:34:41). Public portion opened at 5:16:19; one member of the public spoke, on privacy for the adjoining rear yard (5:16:28 to 5:17:42); closed at 5:18:10.
20.1 P2025-0196 case
Corrective resolution: minor site plan approval with ‘c’ variances, 7 Orchard JC LLC, 7 Orchard Street, Block 15201, Lot 47
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:31:16consent roll call with items 20.1, 20.2, 20.4, 20.5 (memorialization of resolutions; the agenda prints this item as '20' after item 29). 'I move to make...' and 'Second. Second.' (5:31:12 to 5:31:14, word timing), speakers not named; the secretary's roll call from 'On motion to approve, Commissioner Barnaby.' (5:31:16) with every answer heard (Conaway's 'Aye.' at p 0.57, all others 0.99 to 1.00); 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialized resolutions.' (5:31:40). No count announced. Memorialized: the corrective resolution of P2025-0196 on EnerGov (date of hearing May 12, 2026; date of memorialization June 9, 2026; date of corrective memorialization July 14, 2026; p. 5), https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/66e544a3-ca96-4f81-90d9-93cf12d668b5?tab=attachments. Its vote table is the earlier hearing's roll call, not this one.
The first of five resolutions read for memorialization (5:28:17 to 5:31:08), four of them memorialized in one roll call. The agenda lists no individual resolutions; the number 20.x is this record's order of reading. The applicant and street were read as 'Severed Orchard' (5:28:17); the name and address in the title are from the resolution on EnerGov, which is a corrective resolution (p. 5); the reading did not say 'corrective'. The resolution's vote page gives 'Lot 12' where its first page and the reading give Lot 47. The reader is not named (addressed as 'Pat' at 5:28:15, when told 'there are four').
20.2 P2026-0072 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:31:16consent roll call with items 20.1, 20.2, 20.4, 20.5 (memorialization of resolutions; the agenda prints this item as '20' after item 29). 'I move to make...' and 'Second. Second.' (5:31:12 to 5:31:14, word timing), speakers not named; the secretary's roll call from 'On motion to approve, Commissioner Barnaby.' (5:31:16) with every answer heard (Conaway's 'Aye.' at p 0.57, all others 0.99 to 1.00); 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialized resolutions.' (5:31:40). No count announced. Memorialized: the resolution of P2026-0072 on EnerGov (date of hearing June 16, 2026; date of memorialization July 14, 2026; p. 4), https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d14c4ca4-b1a1-49c0-8177-95f2cc20e2f5?tab=attachments. Its vote table is the earlier hearing's roll call, not this one. Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d14c4ca4-b1a1-49c0-8177-95f2cc20e2f5?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Barnaby answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d14c4ca4-b1a1-49c0-8177-95f2cc20e2f5?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d14c4ca4-b1a1-49c0-8177-95f2cc20e2f5?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The second resolution read for memorialization. The agenda lists no individual resolutions; the number 20.x is this record's order of reading. Applicant read as 'Applicate, LLCK Investment Ventures, LLC' (5:28:52); the resolution on EnerGov names LLCK Investment Ventures, LLC (p. 1). The reader is not named (addressed as 'Pat' at 5:28:15, when told 'there are four').
20.3 case
Resolution: preliminary and final major site plan approval, applicant read as '547 LLC'
The third resolution began to be read at 5:29:19 ('applicant 547 LLC for preliminary and final major side plan approval') and was stopped: 'that one's off commissioner okay that one's off' (5:29:31 to 5:29:34). No case number or address was read. It was not included in the memorialization vote.
20.4 P2025-0190 case
Resolution: minor site plan with ‘c’ variances, 311 3rd SPE, LLC, 311 3rd Street, Block 11106, Lot 4
3-0 3 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:31:16consent roll call with items 20.1, 20.2, 20.4, 20.5 (memorialization of resolutions; the agenda prints this item as '20' after item 29). 'I move to make...' and 'Second. Second.' (5:31:12 to 5:31:14, word timing), speakers not named; the secretary's roll call from 'On motion to approve, Commissioner Barnaby.' (5:31:16) with every answer heard (Conaway's 'Aye.' at p 0.57, all others 0.99 to 1.00); 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialized resolutions.' (5:31:40). No count announced. Memorialized: the resolution of P2025-0190 on EnerGov (decided May 12, 2026; memorialized July 14, 2026; p. 1 and p. 7), https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments. Its vote table is the earlier hearing's roll call, not this one. Stamato answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Patel answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Capers answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4c6be5f3-802e-45d9-81a7-7844080e839d?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read as 'item four' (5:29:43). The agenda lists no individual resolutions; the number 20.x is this record's order of reading, and the case number and title are as read on the video. The reader is not named (addressed as 'Pat' at 5:28:15, when told 'there are four'). As read: decided on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, memorialized on Tuesday, July 14, 2026.
20.5 P2025-0191 case
Resolution: minor site plan approval, 44 Coles SPE, LLC, 44 Coles Street, Block 11108, Lot 41
3-0 3 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:31:16consent roll call with items 20.1, 20.2, 20.4, 20.5 (memorialization of resolutions; the agenda prints this item as '20' after item 29). 'I move to make...' and 'Second. Second.' (5:31:12 to 5:31:14, word timing), speakers not named; the secretary's roll call from 'On motion to approve, Commissioner Barnaby.' (5:31:16) with every answer heard (Conaway's 'Aye.' at p 0.57, all others 0.99 to 1.00); 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialized resolutions.' (5:31:40). No count announced. Memorialized: the resolution of P2025-0191 on EnerGov (decided May 12, 2026; memorialized July 14, 2026; p. 1 and p. 4), https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments. Its vote table is the earlier hearing's roll call, not this one. Stamato answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Patel answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Capers answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a347b4b-dee5-4295-be33-be6e01d0cfad?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read as 'Final resolution, item five' (5:30:24). The agenda lists no individual resolutions; the number 20.x is this record's order of reading, and the case number and title are as read on the video. The reader is not named (addressed as 'Pat' at 5:28:15, when told 'there are four'). As read: block '111-08' (5:30:48 to 5:30:51), lot 41; decided on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, memorialized on Tuesday, July 14, 2026.
motion-adjourn motion
Adjournment
Agenda item printed as '22. Adjournment' (the agenda's numbering repeats 20 to 22 after item 29; see needs_checking). Asked whether an executive session was needed (agenda item printed as 21), a speaker who is not named said 'I do not, Madam Chair' (5:31:44). The chair asked for a motion to adjourn (5:31:54); 'motion to adjourn ... second second' (5:32:11; seconded at 5:32:16, word timing), speakers not named; no vote is heard; 'we're adjourned' (5:32:17 to 5:32:23). adjourned.t is the seconded motion (Adam's rule, 2026-10-16); no clock time stated.
Record drafted 2026-10-16, checked 2026-10-16, reviewed by Adam Hanford 2026-10-18.