5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:23:08Roll call read by staff from 'Acting Vice Chair Gungadin' (2:23:08); every answer heard, p 0.95 to 1.00 (2:23:10 to 2:23:16). 'All right, motion carries all in favor with conditions' (2:23:17); no count announced. Rests on the full pass. Motion read as 'case B2025-0134' with staff recommendation and conditions (2:22:56); mover and seconder not named. RESO P2025-0134 on EnerGov (date of hearing January 27, 2026; memorialized March 10, 2026) prints 'VOTING: 5' and 'unanimously approves' and lists Langston, Gangadin, Stamato, Patel and Wick, but its YES/NO/ABSTAIN/ABSENT marks are not in the PDF text, so it does not yet confirm each answer (see needs_checking). The resolution's reading (resolution page read as an image (tick marks not in the PDF text)) agrees in outcome, tally and every member's answer. Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-01-27__11).
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Gonzalez answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 11) and is not-voting (rule A); Kaplan answered abstain but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 11) and is not-voting (rule A). RESO P2025-0134 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/203bd283-2a73-48f1-9f6d-c31f422ab4ba?tab=attachments) gives hearing January 27, 2026 and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.