Meeting record
Planning Board, March 10, 2026
- Body
- Planning Board
- Date
- March 10, 2026 (regular meeting)
- Video
- city recording, 3h 27m
- Called to order
- 0:00:03
- Agenda
- data.jerseycitynj.gov
- Memorialized resolutions
- jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net
- Votes
- 12 confirmed, 1 as heard, unconfirmed
The Planning Board publishes no written minutes, so the votes and attendance on this page are as heard on the video and are marked unconfirmed until a memorialized resolution confirms them (see the
vote rule).
Attendance
Items
1 other
Call to Order
Opened with the Pledge of Allegiance; no clock time stated.
2 other
Sunshine Announcement
Read by staff (addressed as 'Cam'); notice posted with the city clerk on March 5, 2026. Marked as exhibit B1 (0:03:00).
3 other
Roll Call
Called by staff from 0:00:55 (Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Langston, each 'Here'; Stamato's and Patel's answers heard on the re-transcription of 50-90 s); 'we have six commissioners present, we have a quorum' (0:01:12). Wick and Desai were not called. See attendance.
4 other
Swear in Staff
Staff sworn at the chair's request (0:01:15).
5 other
Correspondence
Staff read three requests to carry: item 9 (P2025-0248) to March 24, 2026; item 26 (P2024-0008) to May 12, 2026; item 27 (P2024-0226) to April 28, 2026, each with preservation of notice.
26 P2024-0008 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances, 33 Division Street
Announced under correspondence by staff: the applicant requested a carry with preservation of notice to May 12, 2026. No motion or vote was heard; not called again on the video.
27 P2024-0226 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan, 3085 John F. Kennedy Boulevard
Announced under correspondence by staff: the applicant requested a carry with preservation of notice to April 28, 2026. No motion or vote was heard; not called again on the video.
6 other
ADJOURNMENTS: 6a P2025-0130 (626 Communipaw), 6b P2025-0167 (NJSH Route 440 and 8 NJSH Route 185), 6c P2024-0064 (103, 105 & 107 Monticello Avenue), 6d P2025-0144 (500 Washington Blvd), 6e P23-043 (300 Communipaw Avenue), 6f P2024-0064 (103, 105 & 107 Monticello Avenue), 6g P2025-0129 (2859-2873 Kennedy Blvd), 6h P2024-0088 (87 Bright Street)
Grouped line: none of the eight adjournments was read on the video; the body moved to old business at 0:03:00. The agenda prints 6a-6g as carried to the March 24, 2026 regular meeting and 6h to April 14, 2026, each with preservation of notice. The agenda lists P2024-0064 twice (6c and 6f).
8 P2025-0086 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:38:46Motion to approve 'with the conditions that we talk[ed]' (0:38:36); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair Gonzalez?' (2326.9 s): Gonzalez, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Langston each 'Aye' (p 1.00); 'Motion passes' (0:38:58). Gangadin was not called: a member said 'Chair, I'd have to recuse myself on this one' as the item was read (0:03:00, speaker not named) and the chair noted 'Commissioner Ganga[din] is back' at 0:40:19. RESO P2025-0086 (decided and memorialized March 10, 2026) prints 'Vote: 5 - 0' with Yes marks for Langston, Gonzalez, Patel and Kaplan only, Gangadin under Recusal, Wick and Stamato Absent; Desai not listed. tools/resolutions.py read Gangadin's mark as a nay; the PDF text puts it in the Recusal column. See needs_checking (Stamato). The resolution (RESO P2025-0086) prints 'Vote: 5 - 0' but marks Commissioner Stamato absent and only four members yes; Stamato is heard 'Aye' (0:38:51). Published as heard on Adam Hanford's review of 2026-10-20.
Notice marked A1 (0:05:02). Board attorney arrived during the item. Conditions discussed: roof screening colour left to staff review (0:37:21) and private garbage and recycling collection to be checked against the city ordinance (0:37:32). Public portion opened (0:35:44) and closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:35:48); no public spoke. After the vote the chair introduced Commissioner Kaplan as the board's newest commissioner (0:39:02); it was stated for the record, speaker not named, that Kaplan had been sworn in by the city clerk before the meeting (0:39:39).
9 P2025-0248 case
Read by the chair at 0:40:10-0:40:19; 'It's carried' (0:40:31). Staff had announced under correspondence (0:01:01, 0:01:39) that the applicant requested a carry with preservation of notice to March 24, 2026. No motion or vote was heard. The agenda prints the case number as '2025-0248'; staff read 'P 2025-0248'.
10 P2025-0252 case
6-0-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions, roll call at 0:48:10Motion to approve as presented (0:47:59); mover and seconder not named. Gonzalez 'I vote aye' (0:48:26); Stamato (2932.0 s), Kaplan (2936.8 s), Patel (2939.6 s), Gangadin (2943.3 s) 'Aye'. After 'And Chairman Langston?' (2944.7 s) both the full pass and the re-transcription of 2925-2960 s have only 'I'm sorry, that was aye. All in favor, none opposed.' with no speaker named; the draft left Langston not-voting until Adam Hanford listened (below). No numeric count announced. RESO P2025-0252 (hearing March 10, 2026, memorialized March 24, 2026) prints VOTE 6-0-0 with Langston Yes; Wick and Desai not listed. Chairman Langston's 'that was aye' (0:49:04) is recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20.
Second one-year extension of the approval granted August 9, 2022, sought to August 9, 2026 (0:41:11, 0:42:10). Notice marked A1. One member of the public spoke (0:43:36). Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:47:38). Staff asked that the conditions of the previous approval continue; the applicant agreed (0:47:48).
12 other
Review and discussion of as Certified Artist Filip Pogady, Hugh Hales-Tooke and Teresa Bonner. Formal action may be taken.
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:50:37 as heard, unconfirmedMotion 'to approve, as presented to the board, the review and discussion of certified artists ... and forward to City Council for formal adoption' (0:50:01); mover and seconder not named. All six answers heard (3038.5-3052.1 s, each 'aye' at p 0.98 or above); 'Motion carries. All in favor.' No memorialized resolution read for this item: as heard, unconfirmed.
Staff said the three artists had been certified by the Artist Certification Board and recommended approval (0:49:31). The motion's words: approve and forward to City Council for formal adoption. Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:50:01).
13 P2024-0206 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:17:08Motion to approve as presented (1:16:58); mover and seconder not named. All six answers heard (4630.9-4666.4 s; Langston 'it's a definite aye for me', p 0.63); 'Motion carries all in favor' (1:17:47). RESO P2024-0206 (dates of hearing March 10, 2026; memorialized March 31, 2026) prints VOTE 6-0 with the same six Yes. The resolution's vote table does not list Commissioners Wick and Desai; absent as heard on the video. The vote page's header names the applicant as 'Broadway & Giles Developments LLC' with this case number and address.
Five-storey building with 28 dwelling units, 12 parking spaces and 14 bicycle spaces, as testified by the architect (0:55:14, 0:57:13). Notice marked A1 (0:51:59). The applicant's attorney stated a drive-aisle width variance not in the notice (0:53:32). Conditions: garage exhaust duct inside the building, location to be worked out with staff (1:07:45); staff memo conditions plus a seventh on aesthetics and materials (1:15:46). Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call; no public spoke (1:15:16). The chair announced a 10-minute break at 1:17:49; no motion.
28 P2025-0101 case
6-0-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions, roll call at 2:25:46Motion to approve P2025-0101 'with the conditions outlaid' (2:25:24); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez' (8746.7 s): Gonzalez 'I'm going to vote aye' (8773.6 s); the roll call paused to confirm the vote was on the subdivision only (2:26:17-2:26:28); Gangadin (8792.5 s), Stamato (8795.5 s), Kaplan (8798.4 s), Patel (8800.6 s) 'Aye'; Langston 'Aye on subdivision' (8802.2 s). Stamato's answer rests on the re-transcription of 8760-8880 s (p 0.99); the full pass heard none. 'Motion carries all in favor' (2:26:44). RESO P2025-0101 (hearing March 10, 2026, memorialized March 24, 2026) prints VOTE 6-0-0 with the same six Yes; the table does not list Commissioners Wick and Desai, absent as heard on the video.
Heard together with item 29 (called 1:18:09). Notices marked A1 for each case (1:19:04); aerial exhibit marked A2 (1:23:31). Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call; no public spoke (2:22:45). Conditions stated before the votes: staff memo conditions, sidewalks on both sides of 3rd Street to be worked out with engineering and transportation (2:23:49), and all townhouses on lot 117.03 to be sprinklered (2:25:16).
29 P2025-0102 case
6-0-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions, roll call at 2:27:03Motion to approve P2025-0102 'with the conditions out[lined]' (2:26:46); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (8823.0 s): Gonzalez 'Aye' (8825.0 s); Gangadin 'my vote is aye' (8843.2 s); Stamato 'Aye' (8845.9 s, p 1.00); Kaplan 'thank you, and aye' (8864.6 s); Patel 'Aye' (8866.8 s, p 0.99); Langston 'it's an aye' (8871.8 s). Stamato's and Patel's answers rest on the re-transcription of 8760-8880 s; the full pass heard no answer for Stamato and Patel's at p 0.27. 'Motion carries all in favor' (2:27:52). RESO P2025-0102 (hearing March 10, 2026, memorialized March 24, 2026) prints VOTE 6-0-0 with the same six Yes; the table does not list Commissioners Wick and Desai, absent as heard on the video.
Three buildings on the three lots created by P2025-0101: a three-storey 26-unit building using the Affordable Housing Overlay with four affordable units and no parking (lot 117.01), a three-unit building (lot 117.02) and a 10-unit townhouse building with 11 parking spaces (lot 117.03), 39 units in total, as stated by the applicant's attorney and engineer (1:20:31, 1:27:03). Variances for rooftop appurtenance height and front yard setback, and a lighting design waiver (2:15:45). Conditions as listed under item 28.
14 P2025-0113 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:47:02Motion to approve 'with staff recommendations and conditions' (2:46:46); mover and seconder not named. Acting Vice Chair Gangadin (10024.2 s), Stamato (10027.6 s), Kaplan (10029.5 s), Patel (10031.0 s, p 0.98), Acting Chair Gonzalez (10033.3 s) 'Aye'. Patel's answer rests on the re-transcription of 10005-10045 s; the full pass heard none. 'Motion passes. All in favor.' Langston recused: the acting chair said 'Chairman Langston had to recuse himself on this, and so I am going to be acting chair' (2:37:04); 'Chairman Langston is back' (2:47:19). tools/resolutions.py (fetched 2026-10-21) matches RESO P2025-0113 (decided March 10, 2026, memorialized April 14, 2026) to this hearing: 'Vote: 5-0 in favor', Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato, Patel, Kaplan Yes; Langston not listed. Its vote page is headed 'Case No.: P2025-0086' although the applicant, address and block are 208 Thorne Street. Held unconfirmed; see needs_checking. The resolution's vote page is headed 'Case No.: P2025-0086' although its applicant, address and block are those of P2025-0113 (208 Thorne Street). Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-03-10__14).
New three-storey three-unit building with a detached accessory dwelling unit, two tandem parking spaces (2:30:41, 2:37:15). Not a notice case. Three members of the public spoke (2:37:43-2:43:36). Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (2:46:14). Conditions: staff memo dated February 10, 2026, and revised trash location on the signature set (2:46:22, 2:46:39). Gonzalez acted as chair and Gangadin as acting vice chair for the item.
15 P2025-0062 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:08:36Motion to approve 'with the conditions that we have' (3:08:21); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice-Chair, Dr. Gonzalez' (11316.1 s): Gonzalez 'I'm going to vote aye' (11323.2 s); Gangadin 'My vote is aye' (11332.4 s); Stamato 'I vote aye' (11334.9 s); Kaplan 'Aye' (11348.5 s); Patel 'Aye' (11350.4 s, p 1.00); Langston 'Aye' (11353.0 s). Patel's answer rests on the re-transcription of 11310-11365 s; the full pass ran the two names together with one aye. 'Motion carries. All in favor.' RESO P2025-0062 (date of hearing March 10, 2026) prints VOTE 6-0 with the same six voting in favour; the table does not list Commissioners Wick and Desai, absent as heard on the video.
Four-storey building with four residential units, no variances (2:47:19). Sheet A202 marked A1 and an animation A2 (2:59:21). Condition added by the board: brick to run to the base of the front facade (3:06:10, 3:08:11); staff memo dated 3-6-2026. Public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call; no public spoke (3:07:34).
22 P2024-0182 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan and Interim Use, 200 Chapel Avenue
The applicant's attorney asked to carry items 22 and 23 (3:08:58). Carried to April 28, 2026, at the top of that agenda, with preservation of notice ('So ordered', 3:16:19). No motion or vote was heard.
23 P2024-0229 other
Case: P2024–0229 For: Review and discussion of Master Plan Amendment within Caven Point Redevelopment Plan Petitioner: Pulte Homes of NJ, Limited Partnership Attorney: James C. McCann, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP CARRIED FROM FEBRUARY 10, 2026 REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE
Carried with item 22 to April 28, 2026, with preservation of notice (3:16:19). No motion or vote was heard. Case number taken from the agenda title; the minutes file has no number field for it.
25 P2025-0073 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances, 569 Palisade Avenue
Carried to May 12, 2026 at the attorney's request (3:17:51-3:17:57). No motion or vote was heard.
18 P2025-0008 case
Minor Site Plan, 68 Wayne St
Carried with item 19 to April 14, 2026 (3:18:40, 3:19:08). No motion or vote was heard.
19 P2025-0009 case
Minor Site Plan, 66 Wayne St
Carried with item 18 to April 14, 2026 (3:18:40, 3:19:08). No motion or vote was heard.
30 P2024-0099 case
Carried with preservation of notice to May 12, 2026 (3:19:08-3:19:48). No motion or vote was heard.
20 P2025-0099 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan, 53 Beacon Ave
Carried to April 14, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:20:21, 3:20:45). No motion or vote was heard.
16 P2025-0150 case
Minor Site Plan, 202 Plainfield Ave
Carried with item 17 to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:23:37, 3:23:46). No motion or vote was heard.
17 P2025-0091 case
Minor Site Plan, 69 Lake Street
Carried with item 16 to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:23:37, 3:23:46). No motion or vote was heard.
31.1 P2025-0143 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Langston answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-02-10, item 28) and is not-voting (rule A); Kaplan answered abstain but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-02-10, item 28) and is not-voting (rule A). RESO P2025-0143 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/61898bd7-2cd2-44cf-9754-cfbcc846123c?tab=attachments) gives hearing February 10, 2026 and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.
Resolution 1 of 5 read under agenda item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions' (3:24:22 to 3:27:20); split from the single item 31 on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20. As read: see the item 31 reading list in the checks entry of this date. Hearing: planning-2026-02-10, item 28 (Approved 5-0, t 2:36:51).
31.2 P2024-0219 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Langston answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-02-10, item 14) and is not-voting (rule A); Kaplan answered abstain but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-02-10, item 14) and is not-voting (rule A). RESO P2024-0219 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/933098d2-e386-4ec5-ac9b-6a988e139155?tab=attachments) gives hearing February 10, 2026 and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.
Resolution 2 of 5 read under agenda item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions' (3:24:22 to 3:27:20); split from the single item 31 on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20. As read: see the item 31 reading list in the checks entry of this date. Hearing: planning-2026-02-10, item 14 (Approved 5-0, t 2:12:21).
31.3 P2025-0039 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Gonzalez answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 12) and is not-voting (rule A); Kaplan answered abstain but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 12) and is not-voting (rule A). RESO P2025-0039 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d74241c9-4022-4b15-a5b1-c4d98a29a77e?tab=attachments) gives hearing January 27, 2026 and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.
Resolution 3 of 5 read under agenda item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions' (3:24:22 to 3:27:20); split from the single item 31 on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20. As read: see the item 31 reading list in the checks entry of this date. Hearing: planning-2026-01-27, item 12 (Approved 5-0-0, t 3:06:24).
31.4 P2025-0134 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Gonzalez answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 11) and is not-voting (rule A); Kaplan answered abstain but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-01-27, item 11) and is not-voting (rule A). RESO P2025-0134 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/203bd283-2a73-48f1-9f6d-c31f422ab4ba?tab=attachments) gives hearing January 27, 2026 and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.
Resolution 4 of 5 read under agenda item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions' (3:24:22 to 3:27:20); split from the single item 31 on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20. As read: see the item 31 reading list in the checks entry of this date. Hearing: planning-2026-01-27, item 11 (Approved 5-0, t 2:23:08).
31.5 P2025-0086 case
4-0-1 4 ayes, 0 nays, 1 abstention, roll call at 3:27:09One roll call on 5 resolutions (item 31), split per resolution on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-20: 'Gangadin not-voting on P2025-0086'. Gangadin answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-03-10, item 8) and is not-voting (rule A); Gangadin, recused at the hearing (item 8), answered aye and is not-voting on Adam Hanford's decision. RESO P2025-0086 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/ecb2a781-84a9-4c75-88bc-0991fce5ba57?tab=attachments) gives decision and memorialization March 10, 2026; its vote table is item 8's hearing roll call, not this one. Kaplan said 'I'll abstain on these' as not present at the earlier hearings (3:27:14); the announced count was 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20). Roll call as heard: One roll call on five resolutions. Motion read from 3:24:22 (mover not clearly named: 'Mr. Stamato. Both Stamatos.'), seconded at 12424.3 s. Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Dr. Gonzalez?' (12429.8 s): Gonzalez, Gangadin, Stamato 'Aye'; Kaplan 'Is it appropriate for me to abstain on this item since I wasn't here ... I'll abstain on these' (3:27:14); Patel 'Aye' (12441.9 s, p 1.00) and Langston 'Aye' (12443.1 s). Patel's separate answer rests on the re-transcription of 12415-12461 s; the full pass ran 'Commissioner Patel and Chairman Langston. Aye.' together. Announced 'Five in favor, one abstention' (3:27:20) agrees. Held on eligibility: Gangadin answered aye on a roll call that included the resolution for P2025-0086, on which Gangadin was recused (item 8); see needs_checking.
Resolution 5 of 5 read under agenda item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions' (3:24:22 to 3:27:20); split from the single item 31 on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20. As read: see the item 31 reading list in the checks entry of this date. Hearing: planning-2026-03-10, item 8 (Approved 5-0, t 0:38:46).
32 other
Executive Session, as needed, to discuss litigation, personnel or other matters
A motion to enter executive session was asked for (3:27:29), made (3:27:32, mover not clearly named) and seconded (3:27:35). The video ends at 3:27:41 with no vote heard.
33 other
Adjournment
Not on the video: the recording ends during the motion to enter executive session; no adjournment is heard.
Record drafted 2026-10-19, checked 2026-10-21, reviewed by Adam Hanford (review pending).