Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances, 822-826 Pavonia Avenue

Item 21 · hearing · Approved · 3:45:59

Roll call read by the secretary from 'acting Vice Chair Stamato' (4:31:02, word timing). Stamato: 'Yes' (p 0.62). Every other answer heard (p 0.83 to 0.99; a second 'Aye' after Little's at 4:31:18 is at p 0.26). Secretary: 'Motion carries 7-0, with conditions' (4:31:27). Mover and seconder not named.

Item 20.5 · memorialization · Memorialized · 3:40:07

Consent roll call with items 20.1 to 20.7 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 20, read 3:38:49 to 3:41:20 by a reader not named). 'Can I get a second?' (3:41:20); 'Second, I got a motion to Memorialize Resolutions' (3:41:22); no motion heard apart from the reading; mover and seconder not named. The answers rest on the full pass and the re-transcription without VAD of 3:41:22 to 3:42:00 (word timings). Roll call from 'Vice Chair Wick' (3:41:26): Wick 'Aye' (3:41:27; p 0.46 full pass, 0.99 re-transcription): aye as heard in the re-transcription. Conaway 'Aye' (3:41:30; p 0.96, 1.00). The full pass has a further 'Aye.' (3:41:31, p 0.68) with no name before it, absent from the re-transcription; not credited. Kaplan, Capers, Stamato and Patel 'Aye.' (3:41:32 to 3:41:37, p 1.00 in both passes). Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gangadin' (3:41:38): no answer in the full pass before 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions' (3:41:39); 'Aye.' (3:41:39, p 0.99) in the re-transcription: aye as heard in the re-transcription. No count announced. Heard: 7 ayes. Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 20.1). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-08 (resolutions run 2026-10-17). Eligibility: decided July 14, 2026 (planning-2026-07-14 item 21, 7-0, unconfirmed): Gangadin, Stamato, Conaway, Patel, Little, Barnaby and Capers aye; Wick and Kaplan absent, and no certification heard. Wick and Kaplan answered aye here. Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 21 (Approved 7-0, t 4:30:59)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 21 (Approved 7-0, t 4:30:59)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 21 (Approved 7-0, t 4:30:59) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.