8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 2:01:52Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (2:01:52, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0186 as presented to the board this evening with all staff recommendations and conditions' (2:01:39) and 'Seconded.' (2:01:49, p 0.77); mover and seconder not named. Wick, Stamato, Capers, Conaway, Kaplan, Barnaby 'Aye.' (2:01:54 to 2:02:08, p 1.00); Little, called as 'Commissioner Councilwoman Little?' (2:02:09), 'Aye.' (2:02:12, p 1.00), then a comment on the design and the neighbours (2:02:12 to 2:02:28); Gangadin, called as 'Chairwoman Gangadin?' (2:02:31), '... My vote is aye.' (2:02:51, p 0.92). 'Thank you, all in favor.' (2:02:54). No count announced. Patel absent (not called at the opening roll call; not heard at any point). Second record: RESO P2025-0186 on EnerGov (decided August 25, 2026, memorialized September 29, 2026, p. 1), p. 4: 'DATE OF HEARING: August 25, 2026, carried from June 9, 2026', 'VOTE: 8-0', voting in favor Gangadin, Wick, Little, Stamato, Kaplan, Barnaby, Conaway and Capers, none against, none abstaining; Patel not listed (absent as heard). Read by hand it agrees with the roll call in outcome, tally and every member; held as heard, unconfirmed because the resolutions script read one row of the table (table_tally 1-0); see needs_checking (13). Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-08-25__13).
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 4:37:42Consent roll call with items 17.1 to 17.13 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 17; 13 resolutions read 4:33:28 to 4:37:40 by a reader not named, 'we have 13 resolutions here this evening', 4:33:25). No motion heard apart from the reading; 'Do I have a second? Second.' (4:37:42 to 4:37:45, p 0.96); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair Patel?' (4:37:48, word timing): Patel 'Aye.' (4:37:49); Conaway 'Aye.' (4:37:51); Stamato 'Aye.' (4:37:52); Capers 'Aye.' (4:37:54); Kaplan 'Aye.' (4:37:55); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Congaden?' (4:37:56), 'Aye.' (4:37:57); every answer at p 1.00. 'Motion carries.' (4:37:57). No count announced. Heard: 6 ayes. Wick, Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 17.1). RESO P2025-0186 (EnerGov, uploaded 2026-10-19, https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/fe22276f-b1cc-4f50-9b59-113e5603989a?tab=attachments) prints 'DECIDED: AUGUST 25, 2026' and 'MEMORIALIZED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2026' (pp. 1, 4): it was memorialized at this meeting; its vote table (8-0: Gangadin, Wick, Little, Stamato, Kaplan, Barnaby, Conaway, Capers; p. 4) is the August 25 hearing's roll call, not a second record of this one, and does not list Patel (resolutions run 2026-10-21; the script did not parse the memorialization date). Eligibility: heard August 25, 2026 (planning-2026-08-25 item 13, 8-0, unconfirmed): Conaway, Stamato, Capers, Kaplan and Gangadin aye; Patel absent, and no certification heard. Patel answered aye here. Patel answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-08-25 item 13 (Approved 8-0, t 2:01:52)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-08-25 item 13 (Approved 8-0, t 2:01:52) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.