Meeting record
Planning Board, July 28, 2026
- Body
- Planning Board
- Date
- July 28, 2026 (regular meeting)
- Video
- city recording, 5h 38m
- Called to order
- 0:00:03 (5:34 p.m.)
- Adjourned
- 5:37:46
- Agenda
- data.jerseycitynj.gov
- Memorialized resolutions
- jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net
- Votes
- 13 confirmed
The Planning Board publishes no written minutes, so the votes and attendance on this page are as heard on the video and are marked unconfirmed until a memorialized resolution confirms them (see the
vote rule).
Attendance
Items
7c P2025-0133 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:02:27 (agenda page 7, old business item c): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 11, 2026. The speaker is not named. No motion or vote was heard. The applicant's attorney on item 9 said at 1:05:50 that the board would hear about this application again on August 11.
18 P2025-0172 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:02:57 (agenda page 10, item 18): the applicant requested to carry to August 25, 2026; the speaker said no notice needs to be preserved because it is a minor site plan. No motion or vote was heard. The case had been carried from July 14, 2026 to this meeting.
22 P2025-0246 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:30 (agenda page 12, item 22): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:03:46). No motion or vote was heard.
23 P2025-0253 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:51 (agenda item 23): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:03:58 segment). No motion or vote was heard.
26 P23-043 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances, 300 Communipaw Avenue
Announced in correspondence in the 0:03:58 segment (agenda page 13, item 26): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:04:28). No motion or vote was heard.
27 P2025-0004 case
Administrative Amendment, 278 Pine Street
Announced in correspondence at 0:04:28 as the last carry request (agenda item 27, case read at 0:04:35): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:04:45). 'Madam Chair concludes correspondence' (0:04:50). No motion or vote was heard.
6 other
Cases listed on the agenda as already carried (items 6a to 6l)
Listed on the agenda under '6. ADJOURNMENTS' as carried with preservation of notice; not read on the video, which moved past them to old business at 0:04:50. Cases: 6a P2026-0018 (to August 11); 6b P2024-0240 (to August 11); 6c P23-073 (to August 11); 6d (no case number; 99 Hudson Street, signage) (to August 11); 6e P2026-0013 (to August 11); 6f P2025-0257 (to August 11); 6g P2025-0244 (to August 11); 6h P2026-0023 (to August 25); 6i P2024-0008 (to August 25); 6j P2026-0049 (to August 25); 6k P2025-0270 (to August 25); 6l P2025-0125, Powerhouse Arts District Redevelopment Plan amendments, Block 13002 Transition Bonus (to August 11). P2025-0125 is not mentioned on the video; the board made no recommendation on it at this meeting. Agenda: https://data.jerseycitynj.gov/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/planning-board-agendas-2026/attachments/16_july_28_2026_mtgpdf
7a P2026-0064 case
7-2 7 ayes, 2 nays, roll call at 0:17:40Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (0:18:12), after a motion 'to approve case P2026-0064 as presented to the board with all existing conditions in place' (0:17:59) and 'Second.' (0:18:10); mover and seconder not named. The answers rest on the full pass and the re-transcription without VAD of 0:17:55 to 0:19:30, which agree: Wick 'Aye.' (0:18:14, p 0.97 in the re-transcription; p 0.43 and 0.60 in the full pass); Stamato, Kaplan, Capers, Patel, Little and Gangadin 'Aye.' (p 1.00 in the re-transcription); Conaway 'No.' (0:18:26) and Barnaby 'No.' (0:18:30), p 0.99 to 1.00. Heard: 7 ayes, 2 nays. An unnamed 'Aye.' at 0:18:23 (p 0.00, re-transcription only) is not credited. The secretary's counts differ: 'Motion carries. I believe that's five in favor to against.' (0:18:40), 'With Commissioner Barnaby and Commissioner Capers voting against?' (0:18:57), 'six and two' (0:19:02), 'five and three' (0:19:10), then 'six and two ... Commissioner Conaway and Commissioner Barnaby' (0:19:18 to 0:19:23). Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2026-0064 on EnerGov (date of hearing July 28, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'VOTE: 7-2', p. 5): Yes for Gangadin, Wick, Little, Stamato, Patel, Kaplan and Capers, No for Conaway and Barnaby; it extends the vesting period by two years (p. 3).
- 0:05:32 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the applicant seeks a two-year extension of the vesting period of the P20-022 approval, to October 27, 2027 (0:09:38), under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-52(e), because the project must connect to Bayfront infrastructure not yet built.
- 0:11:55 Samuel Conaway III: Asked whether the development includes affordable units; the applicant's attorney said it has none (0:12:14).
- 0:13:40 Staff: Staff recommended approval with all conditions of the previous approvals remaining in force (0:14:04 to 0:14:20).
Old business item a, called at 0:04:50 (case read at 0:04:59); carried from July 14, 2026. The agenda's title says one-year extension and its description a 2 year period; the applicant asked for two years (0:09:38). The person addressed as 'Stamato' at 0:10:02 and 0:15:18 gave the legal opinion on the extension; see needs_checking. Public portion opened at 0:13:13; no member of the public spoke; closed at 0:13:35 ('Public is closed'). Whether the board could require affordable units was discussed from 0:14:27 to 0:17:40; the zoning does not require them (0:14:49).
7b P2025-0106 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:03:17Roll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (1:03:44, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0106 as presented to the board this evening with all eight conditions' (1:03:32); mover and seconder not named. Kaplan's 'aye' (1:03:49) is at p 0.97 in the re-transcription without VAD of 1:03:40 to 1:04:00 (p 0.02 in the full pass); Barnaby's 'Aye.' (1:03:46) is at p 0.95 in the full pass (0.18 in the re-transcription). Little, Conaway, Patel, Capers, Stamato and Wick 'aye.' (p 0.99 to 1.00); Gangadin: 'So my vote is aye.' (1:04:25, p 0.98). 'Motion carries all in favor with conditions.' (1:04:26). No count announced. Eligibility: the chair asked Capers, Conaway, Barnaby and Little, who were not at the earlier hearing, whether they had read the transcript or watched the video (0:20:19); answers with no name before them are heard ('I have.' 0:20:32, 'Yes.' 0:20:33, 'I have.' 0:20:34, re-transcription without VAD of 0:20:28 to 0:20:45), and Little said 'yes I have reviewed it' (0:21:19). Capers, Conaway and Barnaby each answered aye and are recorded as heard. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0106 on EnerGov (dates of hearing May 12 and July 28, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'VOTE: 9- 0', p. 4): Yes for all nine.
- 0:22:03 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the amendments enlarge the ground-floor retail space for a restaurant tenant and seek approval of a door built in place of an approved window as a second means of egress, which the attorney said was built without the board's approval.
- 0:42:55 Patrick Stamato: Asked whether the owner would allow a small weather station and antenna on the roof; this became the eighth condition (1:02:48).
- 0:49:18 Andy Kaplan: Asked about the reduction of bicycle parking from 55 to 30 spaces and whether the applicant would install bicycle racks on the sidewalk; this became the seventh condition (1:02:12).
- 0:58:03 Samuel Conaway III: Asked how a restaurant's trash would be handled; the architect said commercial tenants keep and remove their own trash within their space.
- 1:01:49 Staff: Staff added two conditions to the six in the planning staff memo dated March 19 and recommended approval; the applicant's attorney agreed to the conditions.
Old business item b, called at 0:19:26 (case read as 'B2025-01 0106'); carried from May 12, 2026 with testimony taken (agenda; RESO P2025-0106 p. 1). The chair read who was present at the earlier hearing (0:19:55 to 0:20:17); see needs_checking. Notice marked A1 (0:21:52); the presentation was remarked A2 (0:30:18). The applicant's attorney was addressed as 'Mr. Wayne' at 0:49:18 (normalise left this name unmatched; the context is the attorney's statement on the affordable housing agreement). Public portion opened in the 1:00:40 segment; no member of the public spoke; closed at 1:00:56. RESO P2025-0106 lists nine conditions (p. 3); the motion named eight (1:03:40).
9 P2025-0068 case
8-1 8 ayes, 1 nay, roll call at 3:06:45Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (3:06:45), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0068 as presented to the board ... with all stated conditions from the planning' (3:06:29); mover and seconder not named. Wick: 'I will vote yes.' (3:07:08, p 1.00). Barnaby, Kaplan, Patel 'Aye.' (p 0.96 to 1.00); Conaway 'No.' (3:07:21, p 0.98). Capers asked staff to go over the variances again (3:07:35; staff listed them from 3:07:39), then said 'I'm going to go aye' (3:08:26, p 0.70). Stamato and Little 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Gangadin: 'I'm going to vote aye.' (3:09:08, p 0.96). Heard: 8 ayes, 1 nay. Announced: 'Motion carries on a motion approved with conditions 8-4 and one against.' (3:09:09; '8' p 0.72, '-4' p 0.98, 'one' p 0.75), read as eight for and one against. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0068 on EnerGov (date of hearing July 28, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'VOTE: 8-1', p. 8): Yes for Gangadin, Little, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Barnaby and Capers, No for Conaway (read from the page image; the extracted text misaligns the column).
- 1:06:57 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the project uses affordable housing bonus B of the Neighborhood District Overlay and proposes 17 storeys, 344 units of which 52 (15%) are affordable, 371 hotel rooms and ground-floor retail.
- 1:21:52 Andy Kaplan: Asked about the Division of Transportation memo on the Marin Boulevard cross-section and a loading zone; the applicant's attorney said the applicant would follow the traffic department's recommendations (1:25:17).
- 1:28:05 Eleana Little: Asked whether the applicant would extend the protected bike lane on Marin Boulevard south from 14th Street to 12th Street; the applicant's attorney said they would look to extend it (1:33:34), and Commissioner Kaplan said that stretch is under Port Authority jurisdiction (1:35:15).
- 1:36:18 Irene Barnaby: Asked whether more street trees could be added on 15th Street or Marin Boulevard (called as 'Commissioner Barabee' at 1:36:17 and confirmed as Barnaby at 1:36:55).
- 3:03:02 Staff: Staff summarised the memo dated November 19, 2025 with six conditions, added coordination of the final Marin Boulevard design, street trees and bike lanes, and recommended approval (3:05:25).
New business, called at 1:04:26; carried from July 14, 2026. Notice marked A1 (1:06:43); the civil engineer's three slides marked A2 (1:14:35); two renderings marked A3 (2:00:19); three aerial photographs marked A4 (2:33:05). The agenda description gives 57 affordable units; the applicant's attorney (1:08:49) and engineer (1:16:04) said 52, as does RESO P2025-0068 (52 of 344, p. 2). The resolution gives the a/k/a address as 166 14th Street (p. 1); the agenda prints 166 4th Street. The board took a ten-minute break at 1:39:34 ('it's 7.13') and was called back to order in the 1:42:29 segment (1:52:41, word timing); no recess motion was heard. After a question from 'Councilwoman Liu' (2:49:09, the name left unmatched by normalise; context suggests Councilperson Little) about the developer's other projects, a speaker not named cautioned the commissioners against further questions on that subject (2:52:39). Public portion opened at 3:02:48; no member of the public spoke; closed at 3:02:54.
10 P2025-0099 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:28:28Roll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Wick.' (3:28:30, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0099 as presented to the board this evening' (3:28:21) and 'I second.' (3:28:28); mover and seconder not named. Every answer heard (p 0.96 to 1.00); Gangadin: 'so I'll vote aye.' (3:28:56). 'All right, motion carries, all in favor.' (3:28:57). No count announced. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0099 on EnerGov (decided July 28, 2026; memorialized August 25, 2026; 'VOTE: 9-0', p. 4): all nine voting in favor, none against or abstaining; its recital names all nine present (p. 1). Read by hand: resolutions.py misread the chair as abstaining (table_tally 8-0-1).
- 3:11:06 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application adds a two-unit addition to an existing single-family house for three units in total, requires major site plan approval because it adds more than 2,500 square feet, and needs no variances.
- 3:26:38 Eleana Little: Asked whether the affidavits of service and publication had been filed; the applicant's attorney said they were sent to staff and the board attorney marked them into evidence (3:27:04).
- 3:25:47 Ben Jordan (Planner, Division of City Planning): Called on as 'Our planner, Ben', said there are no variances and recommended approval.
New business, called at 3:09:42; carried from June 9 with preservation of notice. Notice marked A1 (3:10:34). Public portion opened at 3:25:32; no member of the public spoke; closed at 3:25:37 ('Public is closed', 3:25:42). After the vote the board took a break ('we'll be back at 9.15', 3:29:14) and resumed within the same segment at 3:43:39 (word timing, 'Is Cam back?'); no recess motion or call back to order was heard.
17 P2025-0186 case
After the break the chair said the board would ask the attorneys on the cases it would not reach whether they wanted them carried (3:44:19). At the applicant's attorney's request ('can you carry me to the 25th', 3:44:48) the speaker announced that agenda item 17, P2025-0186, 130 Central Avenue, is carried to August 25, 2026, 'no further notice required' (3:45:04). The announcement is acknowledged with 'Thank you, Santo' (3:45:18). No motion or vote was heard.
16 P2026-0025 case
The applicant's attorney consented to carry item 16 to August 25, 2026 (3:45:50); staff agreed (3:46:17) and the speaker announced the carry to August 25, 2026, no further notice required (3:46:18 to 3:46:32). No motion or vote was heard.
13 P2026-0047 case
The applicant's attorney (addressed as 'Ms. Aline', 3:46:50) asked that several matters be carried with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026, 'starting with case P20260047, that's item 13, 100 Kellogg Street' (3:46:53). 'Okay.' (3:47:10); no separate announcement of this carry is heard. Staff said at 3:49:08 that all items not heard tonight would go to August 25. No motion or vote was heard.
20 P2025-0239 case
The applicant's attorney asked to carry the related cases P2025-0239 and P2025-0240, 197 and 199 Webster Avenue (agenda items 20 and 21, first read as '19 and 20', 3:47:10); the speaker announced both carried to August 25, 2026, no further notice required (3:47:45). No motion or vote was heard.
21 P2025-0240 case
The applicant's attorney asked to carry the related cases P2025-0239 and P2025-0240, 197 and 199 Webster Avenue (agenda items 20 and 21, first read as '19 and 20', 3:47:10); the speaker announced both carried to August 25, 2026, no further notice required (3:47:45). No motion or vote was heard.
24 P2024-0106 case
The applicant's attorney requested a carry (3:48:14); the speaker announced item 24, P2024-0106, carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:48:29). No motion or vote was heard.
25 P2025-0160 case
The applicant's attorney requested a carry with preservation of notice (3:48:52); the speaker announced it carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:49:18). No motion or vote was heard.
29 P2024-0198 case
The applicant's attorney requested a carry, reading it as 'item 30' (3:49:34); the speaker said 'It's case 29 on the agenda' and announced it carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:49:44). No motion or vote was heard.
15 P2024-0099 case
The applicant's attorney, appearing on case 15 (3:50:05), asked that the application, first on an agenda in June of last year, be moved up on the next agenda; staff agreed to list it after 555 Summit (3:51:03 to 3:51:13). The speaker announced it carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:51:36). No motion or vote was heard.
19 P2025-0138 case
The applicant's attorney requested a carry (3:51:52); announced as carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice in the 3:52:04 segment. No motion or vote was heard.
28 P2025-0161 case
No one appeared on case 28 (3:52:35); the speaker said the applicant's attorney had written before the meeting intending to carry (3:52:51), and announced it carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:53:02). No motion or vote was heard.
30 P2025-0169 case
Announced 'out of an abundance of caution' as carried to August 25, 2026 with preservation of notice (3:53:25). No motion or vote was heard. The case had been carried from July 14, 2026 to this meeting.
14 P2026-0108 case
Raised as 'one more, case number 14' (3:53:55); staff ('Matt?') said 'That item's being carried to the next meeting, August 11th. That's the Rossi.' (3:54:00). The case number was read back as 'B2026-0180' with August 25, corrected to August 11 (3:54:07 to 3:54:14); 'the real discussion of the amendments to Chapter 239 of the Municipal Code' (3:54:15). The amendments were not presented or discussed and the board made no recommendation on them; no motion or vote was heard.
11 P2025-0184 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:30:03Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair, Commissioner Wick' (5:30:06, word timing), after the chair asked for 'a motion for case 11, case P2026-0184' (5:29:47) and a motion 'to approve case P2025-0184 as presented to the board tonight' (5:29:56); mover and seconder not named. Every answer heard: Wick 'Aye' (p 0.83); Stamato 'Yes, most definitely' (p 0.96); Patel 'Aye' (p 1.00); Barnaby 'yes, yes, yes' (p 0.99); Capers 'Aye' (p 0.85); Conaway 'Aye' (p 1.00); Kaplan '... for a strong eye' (5:30:51, p 0.96, read as aye); Little 'I proudly vote aye.' (5:31:03, p 0.97); Gangadin 'Aye.' (5:31:07, p 0.99). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (5:31:09). No count announced. First of two roll calls on the 235 16th Street applications (items 11 and 12). Second record: the joint memorialized resolution of P2025-0184 and P2025-0185 on EnerGov (decided July 28, 2026; memorialized August 25, 2026), p. 10: 'P2025-0184 (Subdivision): VOTE: 9-0', all nine voting in favor, none against or abstaining; its recital names all nine present (p. 1). Read by hand: resolutions.py misread the page (twelve '?' names, table_tally 9-0-12).
- 3:55:21 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the Holland Gardens site would be split into two lots and a restored 15th Street, with a 24-storey, 621-unit building and 385 parking spaces on the north lot and a library, 102 senior units and 30 condominiums on the south lot; 753 units, 40% affordable.
- 4:05:52 Applicant: The executive director of the Jersey City Housing Authority, which partners with the developer and keeps ownership of the land, described the resident planning process, the one-for-one replacement of 192 public housing units and the right of return policy.
- 4:21:25 Bhavin Patel: Asked why the building could not be taller; the reply for the applicant (4:21:42, speaker not named) was that relief in a redevelopment plan is limited to 10 feet above the permitted height.
- 5:01:01 Andy Kaplan: Asked who would maintain the restored 15th Street; the reply for the applicant (5:01:36, speaker not named) was that it will be a public right-of-way maintained by the city.
- 5:27:58 Staff: Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions in the memo dated June 28, 2026; the applicant's attorney accepted them (5:29:36).
Items 11 and 12 were carried from July 14, 2026 and heard together. Called at 3:54:20 (case read as 'B2026-0184'); item 12 called at 3:54:28. Combined notice for P2025-0184 and P2025-0185 marked A1 (4:03:28); a 61-page presentation marked A2 (4:05:27). The civil engineer's questioner at 5:13:12 is transcribed 'Commissioner Kepner' (left unmatched by normalise; the question continues Commissioner Kaplan's at 5:02:52). Public portion opened in the 5:26:31 segment; no member of the public spoke; closed ('Okay, public is closed', 5:27:03). Staff ('This is Sophia', 5:27:05) spoke from 5:27:58.
12 P2025-0185 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:31:29Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair, Commissioner Wick' (5:31:29), on a motion to approve Case P2025-0185 with staff recommendations and conditions; mover and seconder not named. Commissioner Capers's answer (5:32:24) is hard to make out on the audio. The secretary announced 'Motion carries all in favor' (5:33:34), and the joint memorialized resolution of P2025-0184 and P2025-0185 (decided July 28, 2026; memorialized August 25, 2026; p. 10) records 'VOTE: 9-0' with Commissioner Capers voting yes; Capers's aye is recorded on those two records, on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Heard together with item 11 (see item 11).
31.1 P2024-0088 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. The resolution memorialized, RESO P2024-0088 (resolution of denial; decided June 30, 2026), prints the June 30 hearing's vote, not this one. Whether every member was eligible to vote on this case was not checked against the June 30 hearing. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The first of seven resolutions read for memorialization. Read: 'Applicant Michael and Claudia case' (5:33:49 line), Block 13905, 'Block 12' (5:34:12); original case number P18-120; 'decided on June 30, 2026, memorialized July 28, 2026' (5:34:17). The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the applicant's surname (Case), the lot (12) and the denial in the title are from RESO P2024-0088 (p. 1, p. 21). The reader is not named.
31.2 P2026-0062 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Vice Chair Wick (5:37:21) and Commissioner Kaplan (5:37:06) answered aye; both were absent from the July 14, 2026 hearing at which this case was approved (planning-2026-07-14 item 7b), and no certification that they had read its transcript or watched its video is heard. No resolution of this case had been posted as of 2026-10-16. Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 7b (Approved 7-0, t 0:19:42)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 7b (Approved 7-0, t 0:19:42)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 7b (Approved 7-0, t 0:19:42) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The second resolution read. Read: formerly Lot 3.11; no decision or memorialization date read. Heard and approved at the July 14, 2026 meeting (planning-2026-07-14, item 7b). The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
31.3 P2025-0087 case
Resolution: subdivision approval, 141-143 Oxford Ave LLC, 141-143 Oxford Avenue, Block 19301, Lot 4
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Whether every member was eligible to vote on this case was not checked against the hearing at which it was decided. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The third resolution read (from 5:34:51, word timing). No decision or memorialization date read. The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
31.4 P2025-0269 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. Not eligible (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A): Stamato, absent from the 2026-05-12 hearing; Conaway, not on the board at the 2026-05-12 hearing; Patel, absent from the 2026-05-12 hearing; Capers, not on the board at the 2026-05-12 hearing. Each answered aye here and is recorded not-voting. Decided at the hearing of 2026-05-12 (planning-2026-05-12, item 23). Applied on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-21; recorded 9-0 as heard before.
The fourth resolution read (from 5:35:12, word timing). No decision or memorialization date read. The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
31.5 P2026-0094 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Vice Chair Wick (5:37:21) and Commissioner Kaplan (5:37:06) answered aye; both were absent from the July 14, 2026 hearing at which this case was approved (planning-2026-07-14 item 7a), and no certification that they had read its transcript or watched its video is heard. No resolution of this case had been posted as of 2026-10-16. Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 7a (Approved 7-0, t 0:11:19)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 7a (Approved 7-0, t 0:11:19)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 7a (Approved 7-0, t 0:11:19) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The fifth resolution read (from 5:35:35, word timing). Read: Lots 3.05, 3.16, 3.17, 3.19, 3.20 and 3.21, formerly Lots 3.11, 3.12, 3.16, 3.18 and 3.05; no decision or memorialization date read. Heard and approved at the July 14, 2026 meeting (planning-2026-07-14, item 7a). The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
31.6 P2024-0229 case
9-0 9 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Whether every member was eligible to vote on this case was not checked against the hearing at which it was decided. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The sixth resolution read (from 5:36:07, word timing). The case number was read 'Case 2024-0229' (5:36:20, 'Case' p 0.44), with no 'P'; the number here adds it. No decision or memorialization date read. The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
31.7 P2024-0182 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:36:47One roll call memorialized the seven resolutions read from 5:33:49 to 5:36:39 (items 31.1 to 31.7). No motion is heard; a second is heard at 5:36:44, speakers not named. The secretary's roll call began at 5:36:47; Commissioner Barnaby, called twice, answered 'I'm sorry, aye.' (5:37:03), and every other member answered aye. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (5:37:28); no count announced. Whether every member was eligible to vote on this case was not checked against the hearing at which it was decided. Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18. Stamato answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Barnaby answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Capers answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The seventh resolution read (from 5:36:24, word timing). No decision or memorialization date read. The agenda lists no individual resolutions (item 31, 'Memorialization of Resolutions'); the number 31.x is this record's order of reading and the case number, applicant and address are as read on the video. The reader is not named.
motion-adjourn motion
Adjournment
Agenda items 32 (Executive Session) and 33 (Adjournment). 'Any executive session? Think we're good?' (5:37:35 to 5:37:41); none was held. 'Can I get motions adjourned then?' (5:37:42); 'I make the motion that we do.' (5:37:44) and 'Second.' (5:37:46, p 0.99, word timing), speakers not named; no vote is heard. adjourned.t is the seconded motion (Adam's rule, 2026-10-16); no clock time stated.
Corrected 2026-10-21: 5-0; Stamato, Conaway, Patel, Capers not-voting
LogRecord drafted 2026-10-16, checked 2026-10-16, reviewed by Adam Hanford 2026-10-18.