8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:31:03Roll call from 'Acting Vice Chair Gangadin' (0:31:03). Gangadin answered 'my vote is aye' (0:31:04); Stamato answered 'I'm in favor of it' (0:31:14), recorded aye; Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Little and Barnaby 'Aye'. 'Motion carries, all in favor' was announced (0:31:27) before Langston was called; the secretary then called 'Chairman Langston' (0:31:29) and Langston answered 'So my vote is aye' (0:31:31 segment); 'Motion carries all in favor' again (0:32:03). Approval with conditions. Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:30:50, 0:30:59). Rests on the full pass (answers p 0.69 to 0.99). Confirmed by RESO P2025-0225 on EnerGov ('Decided on Tuesday, April 28th, 2026', hearing carried to April 28, 2026, memorialized June 30, 2026): 'Vote: 8-0 IN FAVOR', the same eight members yes; read by the checker from the PDF text, which tools/resolutions.py did not match (it parsed no case number or hearing date). The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call).
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:29:43Memorialization roll call: every answer heard; the two not-voting members were not eligible (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A) and do not hold the roll call; published on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20 (needs_checking item 22.3, resolved). Consent roll call with items 22.1 and 22.3 to 22.6; answers as in item 22.1 (every answer heard, p 0.99 to 1.00). Read as 'decided on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, memorialized on June 30, 2026' (5:27:36). Decided April 28, 2026 (planning-2026-04-28, item 13: Gangadin, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Little and Barnaby voted aye). Not eligible (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A): Capers and Conaway, not on the board on April 28 (members.json term_start 2026-06-16); both answered aye here and are recorded not-voting. Applied on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20 ('Rule A; Barnaby not-voting on 22.1 (recused June 9), as heard on 22.5'); hearing planning-2026-04-28, item 13. Capers answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-04-28, item 13): not-voting (rule A); Conaway answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-04-28, item 13): not-voting (rule A).
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 5:29:43Memorialization roll call: every answer heard; the two not-voting members were not eligible (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A) and do not hold the roll call; published on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20 (needs_checking item 22.3, resolved). Consent roll call with items 22.1 and 22.3 to 22.6; answers as in item 22.1 (every answer heard, p 0.99 to 1.00). The deed was read as one of the items memorialized and is counted among the 'five resolutions' (5:29:43); eligibility as for the April 28, 2026 decision of P2025-0225 (item 22.3): Capers and Conaway, not on the board on April 28, answered aye and are recorded not-voting (EDITORIAL.md section 4, rule A). Applied on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-20 ('Rule A; Barnaby not-voting on 22.1 (recused June 9), as heard on 22.5'); hearing planning-2026-04-28, item 13. Capers answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-04-28, item 13): not-voting (rule A); Conaway answered aye but did not vote at the hearing (planning-2026-04-28, item 13): not-voting (rule A).