Meeting record
Planning Board, April 28, 2026
- Body
- Planning Board
- Date
- April 28, 2026 (regular meeting)
- Video
- city recording, 3h 52m
- Called to order
- 0:00:00
- Adjourned
- 3:52:46
- Agenda
- data.jerseycitynj.gov
- Memorialized resolutions
- jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net
- Votes
- 16 confirmed
The Planning Board publishes no written minutes, so the votes and attendance on this page are as heard on the video and are marked unconfirmed until a memorialized resolution confirms them (see the
vote rule).
Attendance
Items
6 other
ADJOURNMENTS a) Case: P2025-0091 For: Minor Site Plan Address: 69 Lake Street Applicant: 69 Lake Realty LLC Attorney: Benjamin Wine, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP CARRIED TO May 12, 2026 REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE. b) Case: P2024-0008 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances Address: 33 Division Street Applicant: 33-39 Division Street, LLC Attorney: Thomas P. Leane, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP CARRIED TO May 12, 2026 REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE. c) Case: P2025-0106 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site plan amendments Address: 342 Johnston Avenue Applicant: 342 Johnston Equities, LLC Attorney: Thomas Leane, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice d) Case: P2025-0068 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with variances Address: 597 Marin Boulevard aka 166 4th Street Applicant: Namdar Group LLC Attorney: Thomas Leane, Esq. Review Planner: Matt Ward, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice e) Case: P23-043 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variance Address: 300 Communipaw Avenue Applicant: 95 Van Dam Corp. Attorney: Eugene P. O’Connell, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice f) Case: P20-168 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Address: 417-427 Hoboken Avenue Applicant: Delancey Development, LLC Attorney: Patrick Conlon, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice g) Case: P2024-0106 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances Address: 120 Theodore Conrad Drive (aka 120 Edward Hart Drive) Applicant: Titan Filosa, LLC Attorney: Thomas Leane Jr., Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice h) Case: P2025-0160 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with Variances Address: 89 Ocean Avenue Applicant: Ocean Avenue Developers NJ LLC Attorney: Thomas P. Leane, Esq. Review Planner: Xunru Huang & Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice i) Case: P2025-0067 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ variances Address: 8-16 Lott Street & 625-639 Newark Avenue Applicant: Homestead Market, LLC Attorney: Charles Harrington III, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP PP Carried to May 26, 2026 with preservation of notice j) Case: P2025-0087 For: Minor Subdivision with ‘c’ Variances Address: 141 Oxford Avenue Applicant: 141-143 Oxford Ave, LLC Attorney: Zully Rosado Review Planner: Sophia E. Pereira Carried to MAY 12, 2026, REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE. k) Case: P2025-0196 For: Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ Variance Address: 7 Orchard St Applicant: 7 Orchard JC LLC Attorney: Veronica Chmiel Review Planner: Ben Jordan Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice l) Case: P2025-0190 For: Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ Variances Address: 311 Third St Applicant: 311 3rd SPE, LLC Attorney: Stephen Joseph, Esq. Review Planner: Ben Jordan Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice m) Case: P2025-0191 For: Minor Site Plan Address: 44 Coles St Applicant: 44 Coles SPE, LLC Attorney: Stephen Joseph, Esq. Review Planner: Ben Jordan Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice n) Case: P2025-0176 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Address: 723 Grand St Applicant: John 723 LLC Attorney: Charles Harrington, Esq. Review Planner: Ben Jordan Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice o) Case: P2024-0240 For: Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ Variances Address: 916 & 918 West Side Avenue Applicant: Prashant Shah Attorney: Jarrold Kaminsky, Esq. Review Planner: Sophia E. Pereira, AICP Carried to MAY 26, 2026, REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE. p) Case: P2024-0226 For: Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Address: 3085 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Applicant: Chosen Square, LLC Attorney: Charles J. Harrington, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP Carried to June 30, 2026 REGULAR MEETING. q) Case: P2025-0017 For: Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ variance Address: 115 Neptune Avenue Applicant: 115 Neptune Ave LLC Attorney: Eugene O’Connell, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice r) Case: P2025-0018 For: Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ variance Address: 117 Neptune Avenue Applicant: 117 Neptune Ave LLC Attorney: Eugene O’Connell, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice s) Case: P2025-0116 For: Minor Subdivision Address: 115-117 Neptune Avenue Applicant: 115 Neptune Ave LLC Attorney: Eugene O’Connell, Esq. Review Planner: Cameron Black, AICP, PP Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice t) Case: P2026-0001 For: Review and discussion of amendments to the Jackson Hill Redevelopment Plan regarding the expansion of the Transit Proximity Bonus. Study of an amendment authorized by council resolution 25-679. Formal action may be taken. Petitioner: Terry Developments LLC Review Planner: Matt Ward, AICP, PP Ward: F and A Carried to May 12, 2026 with preservation of notice
Grouped line for the twenty adjournments a) to t). The chair passed over the list ('So, past adjournments, a lot of adjournments', 0:01:42) and moved to old business; no case on the list was read on the video and no motion or vote was taken. The carried dates (May 12, May 26 and June 30, 2026) are as printed on the agenda, not as heard.
8 P2026-0046 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:03:42Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Gangadin?' (0:03:42). Rests on the window re-transcription 215-245, which hears every answer (p 0.97 to 1.00), Barnaby 'Aye.' at 235.6 s (p 1.00); the full pass heard no answer for Barnaby and a stray 'Aye.' at 231.9 s (p 0.01) that the window does not have. Announced 'Motion carries all in favor.' (240.6 s), with no count. Motion and second by commissioners not named on the video (0:03:31, 0:03:39). RESO P2026-0046 on EnerGov (hearing April 28, 2026, memorialized May 12, 2026) prints 'VOTE: 8-0' and names the same eight members in favor, but its table has a blank row 5, so the vote stays unconfirmed. The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call). Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-04-28__8).
Called as item eight (0:01:42 segment) and read as P2026-0046 at 0:02:23. The applicant's attorney, heard as 'Adam Lazarus' (the agenda names Benjamin T.F. Wine, Esq.), sought the first one-year extension (0:02:34). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:03:19). Staff recommended approval (0:03:27).
9 P2026-0035 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:06:04Roll call from 'Acting Vice Chair Gangadin.' (364.8 s, word timing, in the 0:05:56 segment); every answer heard, p 0.99 to 1.00. Announced 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (378.0 s). Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:05:33, 0:05:56). Rests on the full pass. Confirmed by RESO P2026-0035 on EnerGov (decided April 28, 2026, memorialized May 12, 2026): roll call table with Langston, Gangadin, Wick, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Barnaby and Little in favor, 'Approved: 8-0 in favor'; read by the checker from the PDF text, whose table tools/resolutions.py did not parse. The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call).
Called at 0:04:03 (word timing 243.8 s). Applicant's attorney heard as Michael Silbert (the agenda names Benjamin L. Lindeman, Esq.). The transcript has no text between 0:04:55 and 0:05:33; the public portion and staff comment, if any, are not in the transcript.
10 P2025-0224 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:09:34Roll call from 'Vice Chair Gagnonon' (Gangadin, 0:09:34). Rests on the window re-transcription 565-595, which hears every answer (p 0.97 to 1.00); the full pass heard Gangadin's 'Aye' at p 0.04 (574.1 s) and the others at p 0.95 to 0.99. Announced 'Motion carries, all in favor' (0:09:48). Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:09:20, 0:09:29). Confirmed by RESO P2025-0224 on EnerGov (hearing April 28, 2026, memorialized May 26, 2026): 'VOTE: 8-0', the same eight members yes. The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call).
- 0:06:27 Attorney: Charles Harrington, for the applicant, asked for two one-year extensions, retroactive from September 2024, of a 2022 approval for seven storeys and 35 units in Zone 4 of the Journal Square 2060 Redevelopment Plan.
- 0:07:33 Unidentified: A board member asked whether an extension would exempt the applicant from any new affordable housing requirements.
- 0:08:54 Staff: Staff (addressed as 'Matt') recommended approval.
Called at 0:06:21 (381.1 s). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:08:44).
11 P2026-0044 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:11:56Roll call from 'Acting Vice Chair Gankanen' (Gangadin, 716.0 s, word timing, in the 0:11:46 segment); every answer heard, p 0.99 to 1.00. Announced 'Motion carries all in favor.' (730.8 s). Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:11:15 segment, 712.0 s). Rests on the full pass. RESO P2026-0044 on EnerGov (memorialized May 12, 2026) recites a hearing on April 28, 2026 and has an 8-0 table with the same eight members yes, but its vote page prints 'DATE OF HEARING: April 30, 2026'; not used as a second record until Adam settles the date (needs_checking). The resolution's header prints 'DATE OF HEARING: April 30, 2026'; its recital gives the hearing as April 28, 2026. Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-04-28__11).
Charles Harrington for the applicant: approval of May 2024 for 51 senior housing units, one-year extension requested (0:09:59). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:11:15 segment). Staff (addressed as 'Sophia') asked that the prior approval's conditions continue, the applicant agreed, and staff recommended approval.
13 P2025-0225 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:31:03Roll call from 'Acting Vice Chair Gangadin' (0:31:03). Gangadin answered 'my vote is aye' (0:31:04); Stamato answered 'I'm in favor of it' (0:31:14), recorded aye; Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Little and Barnaby 'Aye'. 'Motion carries, all in favor' was announced (0:31:27) before Langston was called; the secretary then called 'Chairman Langston' (0:31:29) and Langston answered 'So my vote is aye' (0:31:31 segment); 'Motion carries all in favor' again (0:32:03). Approval with conditions. Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:30:50, 0:30:59). Rests on the full pass (answers p 0.69 to 0.99). Confirmed by RESO P2025-0225 on EnerGov ('Decided on Tuesday, April 28th, 2026', hearing carried to April 28, 2026, memorialized June 30, 2026): 'Vote: 8-0 IN FAVOR', the same eight members yes; read by the checker from the PDF text, which tools/resolutions.py did not match (it parsed no case number or hearing date). The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call).
- 0:12:24 Attorney: Stephen Joseph, for the applicant, said the application is a preliminary and final major subdivision with a 'c' variance, not as listed on the agenda, and was noticed as such.
- 0:14:00 Applicant: The applicant's architect, Jeffrey Lewis, described subdividing the 16,000 square foot lot into six 25-foot lots, one of 2,250 square feet against 2,500 required, with three shared curb cuts.
- 0:17:53 Applicant: The applicant's planner, Alexander Dougherty, gave testimony on the C2 variance test (exhibit A-2).
- 0:27:43 Staff: Staff (addressed as 'Matt') agreed with the C2 testimony and recommended approval with the two conditions of the April 9, 2026 memo and the forestry comments, which the applicant accepted.
Called at 0:12:15 (735.5 s) as P2025-0225 (the agenda prints Minor Subdivision with 'c' variance). Notice marked A-1 (0:13:23). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:27:11 segment).
21 P2025-0032 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan with ‘c’ Variances, 662 Communipaw Ave.
Taken up out of order: Stephen Joseph asked at 0:32:03 to carry items 21 and 22 ('21 and 22, 662 Communopole Avenue, P2025-0032, and 3032 Waverly Street, P2025-0127', 0:32:39). The chair announced P2025-0032 carried to a date certain, May 12, 2026, with preservation of notice and that the public would receive no new notice (0:33:12 to 0:34:01). No motion or vote was heard. The agenda names Michael Higgins, Esq. as this case's attorney.
22 P2025-0127 case
Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ Variances, 30-32 Waverly St
Carried with item 21 at the request of Stephen Joseph (0:32:03): the chair announced P2025-0127 carried to a date certain, May 12, 2026, with preservation of notice (0:33:29 segment). No motion or vote was heard.
14 P2025-0180 case
Michael Higgins for the applicant tendered the notice (0:34:21); a side yard variance was conceded and a clerical issue with the notice was raised (0:34:29). The applicant asked to carry; the case was adjourned to a date uncertain, with new notice to be served in coordination with staff (0:36:38); the chair said objectors would receive new notice (0:36:43). No date named; no motion or vote was heard. The transcript has no text between 0:34:29 and 0:36:38.
15 P2025-0131 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:41:34Roll call from 'Vice Chair Gangadin' (0:41:34); every answer heard, also in the window re-transcription 2488-2515 (answers p 0.99 to 1.00). Announced 'Motion carries all in favor' (0:41:49). Approval with conditions. Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:41:22, 0:41:30). Rests on the full pass and the window. RESO P2025-0131 on EnerGov (hearing date April 28, 2026, memorialized May 12, 2026) names the same eight members aye but prints 'Vote: 9-0 in favor' over nine rows with Wick listed twice ('WICK', 'ELIZABETH WICK'); the table does not add up, so the vote stays unconfirmed (needs_checking). The resolution prints 'Vote: 9-0 in favor' over nine rows that list Commissioner Wick twice; its eight members match the eight ayes heard. Published as heard on Adam Hanford's Review Desk decision of 2026-10-22 (card planning-2026-04-28__15).
James Burke for the applicant: subdivision of a 50 by 100 foot lot into two 25 by 100 foot lots, no variances, existing curb cut to be closed (0:37:25, 0:39:17). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:40:40 segment). Staff (addressed as 'Sophia') asked for the conditions of the March 24, 2026 memo; the applicant agreed (0:41:02).
16 P2025-0128 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:45:36Roll call from 'Vice Chair, Gangadin?' (2736.1 s, word timing, in the 0:45:33 segment); every answer heard, p 0.93 to 1.00. Announced 'Motion carries, all in favor.' (2754.1 s). Motion and second by commissioners not named (0:45:24, 0:45:32). Rests on the full pass. Confirmed by RESO P2025-0128 on EnerGov (hearing date April 28, 2026, memorialized May 12, 2026): Wick, Patel, Stamato, Gangadin, Langston, Little, Barnaby and Kaplan aye, 'Approved: Unanimous'; no tally is printed, so the minutes tally 8-0 is counted from the table. Read by the checker from the PDF text, which tools/resolutions.py did not match. The table does not list Commissioner Gonzalez, recorded absent (not called in the opening roll call).
- 0:44:22 Unidentified: A board member said the property is in their neighborhood but slightly outside the 200-foot mark, and so they were able to vote.
James Burke for the applicant: subdivision of a 50 by 100 foot lot into two 25 by 100 foot lots, no variances, existing curb cut to be removed (0:43:38). Notice marked A-1 (0:42:36). No public comment; public portion closed on a motion and second with no roll call (0:44:43). Staff (addressed as 'Ben') recommended approval with the conditions of the April 28, 2026 memo, which the applicant accepted (0:44:53 to 0:45:21). The chair then announced a ten-minute break (0:46:07).
18 P2024-0182 case
Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan and Interim Use, 200 Chapel Avenue
- 0:56:38 Attorney: Counsel for the Port Liberte Homeowners Association, an objector, argued that the Caven Point Redevelopment Plan, adopted November 7, 1984, expired after 40 years and that the board lacked authority to hear the application (memorandum marked O-1).
- 1:05:51 Attorney: James McCann, for the applicant, cited a November 12, 2024 zoning officer determination (A-15) and a 2021 Zoning Board decision on 303 First Street (A-16) holding that the plan's zoning regulations remain in effect, and said the application was filed September 18, 2024.
- 1:44:58 Santo Alampi (Board Attorney): The board attorney explained the time of application rule and the Zoning Board's jurisdiction over appeals of zoning officer determinations.
- 2:15:39 Christopher Langston: Chairman Langston said the application was properly before the board under the time of application rule, and other members spoke in agreement.
- 2:35:45 Applicant: The applicant's civil engineer, Brian Waisner, described revised civil plans (A-22), the stormwater report (A-23) and the agreement to reimburse the JCMUA for pump station upgrades and one third of a netting chamber.
Called with item 19 (0:46:35) after a break announced at 0:46:07; testimony continued from earlier hearings. Appearances: James McCann for the applicant, Pulte Homes; counsel for the Port Liberte Homeowners Association and Cynthia Hadjiannis for Port Liberte Condo Association No. 1, objectors (0:47:05 to 0:48:08). Eligibility (0:49:02 to 0:50:25): the two new members said they had read the transcripts (0:49:16); a member said they had missed one meeting and watched the video (0:49:32); Gangadin, said to have missed the August 12 meeting, said they had watched and read the transcript (0:50:09 to 0:50:18). Stamato was stated to have recused from the application and left the building (0:49:49). On the expiration objection no motion or roll call was taken; the board attorney summarized at 2:16:56 that the board determined the application goes forward under the time of application rule and that, if not, jurisdiction over the expiration issue lies with the Board of Adjustment. A break followed (2:17:31). Testimony: traffic engineer Carl Penke (supplemental traffic statement of October 17, 2025, A-21; 2:18:08) and civil engineer Brian Waisner (A-22 to A-28; 2:25:15), cross-examined by objectors' counsel (3:16:15). Exhibits marked A-15 to A-28 and O-1. The applicant declined to extend the board's time to act past May (3:37:10). The chair announced the case carried to May 12, 2026, with a possible special meeting on May 19 to be discussed with staff (3:47:58); no roll call ('Do we need a roll call for this? Okay.'). Preservation of notice for May 12 was discussed at 3:38:27 but not restated at 3:47:58.
19 P2024-0229 case
Case: P2024–0229 For: Review and discussion of Master Plan Amendment within Caven Point Redevelopment Plan Petitioner: Pulte Homes of NJ, Limited Partnership Attorney: James C. McCann, Esq. Review Planner: Matthew da Silva, AICP, PP CARRIED FROM THE MARCH 24, 2025, REGULAR MEETING WITH PRESERVATION OF NOTICE. TESTIMONY TAKEN.
Called together with item 18 (0:46:35). No testimony on the master plan amendment was taken; during cross-examination an unnamed speaker said it had not yet been reached ('That's the next case', 3:25:53). Recorded as carried to May 12, 2026 with item 18 on the chair's statement 'we're going to carry this to the 12th' (3:47:58), which did not name this case separately. Case number from the agenda (printed 'P2024–0229'); the minutes file gives no number.
23.1 P2025-0233 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9. Roll call from 'Commissioner Wick?' (3:51:47, word timing 13907.5 s): Wick 'Aye' (p 0.99); Little asked what was being voted on, said they were not at the last meeting and 'we'll recuse' (3:52:15); 'so two recusals' (3:52:17); Kaplan 'Aye' (p 0.67), Patel 'Aye' (p 0.65), Gangadin 'Aye' (p 0.98, 3:52:29); Langston called (3:52:30), no answer heard; Barnaby never called. The window re-transcription 13900-13965 hears Wick, Kaplan (p 1.00) and Patel (p 0.99) 'Aye', an unnamed 'Same with me.' after Little's recusal (3:52:17), and no answer from Gangadin or Langston: the two passes differ on Gangadin. Announced 'five in favor, two recusing, motion carries, the resolutions are memorialized' (3:52:32). The count leaves one aye and one recusal for two members not heard (Langston, Barnaby), which can be split two ways, so it fills nothing. Stamato had left the building (0:49:49). Read as 'B2025-0233'; hearing 2026-03-24 (planning-2026-03-24, item 16), where Gangadin, Wick, Kaplan, Patel and Langston were present. RESO P2025-0233 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/02ea7d10-b428-4ee1-9e28-60179fb67354?tab=attachments) prints hearing March 24, 2026 and memorialization 'April __28, 2026', and lists Wick as recused at the hearing (needs_checking). Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20. Wick, who recused at the hearing, is not-voting.
Read as 'Resolution 1, Devon Property, Co-LLC for preliminary and final major site plan, amendments, 3, New York Avenue ... Block 6001, Lot 36, case numbers B2025-0233' (3:48:26).
23.2 P2026-0033 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1 (Langston and Barnaby not heard; 'five in favor, two recusing', 3:52:32, fills nothing). Read as 'B2026-0033'; hearing 2026-03-31 (planning-2026-03-31, item 7b), where Langston was absent: Langston would not be eligible on that record (rule A), in addition to no answer being heard. RESO P2026-0033 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/b2be8f58-2e1a-43e6-8cfb-4752fc6f3592?tab=attachments) prints hearing March 31, 2026, original memorialization April 14, 2026 and corrective memorialization April 28, 2026; its 5-0 table (no Langston) is the hearing's roll call, not this one. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20; Langston was absent at this case's hearing and is not-voting (rule A).
Read as 'Grove Street Partners, LLC, for extension and preliminary and final major site plan. Approval, 659 Grove Street, Block 6002, Lot 8, case number is B2026-0033' (3:49:09).
23.3 P2025-0129 case
Resolution: preliminary and final major site plan approval with deviations, Kennedy Blvd Acquisitions, LLC, 2859-2873 John F. Kennedy Boulevard, Block 10601, Journal Square 2060 Redevelopment Plan, Zone 3
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'Speed 2025-0129, April 14, 2026'; hearing 2026-04-14 (planning-2026-04-14, item 9). RESO P2025-0129 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/b0b9fe90-26c7-4205-9376-48957ab51d78?tab=attachments) prints hearing April 14, 2026 and memorialization April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20.
Read at 3:49:24; lots heard as '43248'.
23.4 P2025-0144 case
Resolution: preliminary and final major site plan, 500 Washington Boulevard, Block 7302, Lots 52 and 53
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. No case number was read; matched by address to P2025-0144, heard 2026-03-24 (planning-2026-03-24, item 13). RESO P2025-0144 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/811db937-712b-4922-9998-df75b8723b53?tab=attachments), for 500 Washington Boulevard, prints hearing March 24, 2026 and memorialization April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20.
Read as 'City of Jersey City approving preliminary and final major site plan for 500 Washington Boulevard, block 7302, lots 52 and 53' (3:49:55 segment), with no case number.
23.5 P2026-0037 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'B2026-0037'; hearing 2026-04-14 (planning-2026-04-14, item 11). RESO P2026-0037 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/3b8dab04-ff82-4479-8bd8-c533f4bc5e25?tab=attachments) prints hearing April 14, 2026 and memorialization 'April 28. 2026'. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20.
Read as 'Approving minor site plan, case numbers B2026-0037, submitted by new Singular Wireless PCS LLC, 2854 John F. Kennedy Boulevard' (3:49:55 to 3:50:26).
23.6 P2025-0150 case
Resolution: minor site plan approval, Paramjeet & Jaideep & Achint Singh, 202 Plainfield Avenue, Block 14602, Lot 30
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'P2025-0150'; approved 2026-03-31 (planning-2026-03-31, item 11, 202 Plainfield Ave), where Langston was absent: Langston would not be eligible on that record (rule A). RESO P2025-0150 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/f7b3efa5-cf30-4783-b062-9ddabf68f3e2?tab=attachments) prints decided March 31, 2026 and memorialized April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20; Langston was absent at this case's hearing and is not-voting (rule A).
Read as 'Approved in the matter of Paramjit and Jayjit and Achint Singh. Applicant number is P2025-0150 for minor site plan approval' (3:50:26 segment); no address read.
23.7 P2024-0212 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'P2024-0212'; approved 2026-03-31 (planning-2026-03-31, item 20), where Langston was absent: Langston would not be eligible on that record (rule A). RESO P2024-0212 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/a1269290-474f-467b-b9b6-b30030dabe2a?tab=attachments) prints decided March 31, 2026 and memorialized April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20; Langston was absent at this case's hearing and is not-voting (rule A).
Read as 'In the matter of 792, Communipa holding LLC applicant. Case number is P2024-0212 ... for major site plan approval and use and conditional use approval' (3:50:26 to 3:51:01).
23.8 P2025-0166 case
4-0 4 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'P2025-0166 decided March 31st, 2026'; approved 2026-03-31 (planning-2026-03-31, item 16), where Langston was absent: Langston would not be eligible on that record (rule A). RESO P2025-0166 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/64ed239a-724a-48c2-80ec-e516ed9d52d8?tab=attachments) prints decided March 31, 2026 and memorialized April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20; Langston was absent at this case's hearing and is not-voting (rule A).
Read at 3:51:01.
23.9 P2024-0064 case
Resolution: preliminary and final major site plan approval, Ibrahim Fayed, 103, 105 and 107 Monticello Avenue, Block 17906, Lots 25, 26 and 27
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:47Consent roll call with items 23.1 to 23.9; answers as in item 23.1. Read as 'P2024-0604'; matched by address to P2024-0064, approved 2026-03-24 (planning-2026-03-24, item 10). A second is heard at 3:51:42; no mover was heard. RESO P2024-0064 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/d64e7f83-c2b4-4b2d-9b47-f9b67cf3042a?tab=attachments), for 103-107 Monticello Avenue, prints hearing March 24, 2026 and memorialization April 28, 2026. Rests on the full pass. Barnaby's recusal and Langston's answer are recorded on Adam Hanford's listening of 2026-10-20.
Read as 'case number P2024-0604 for preliminary and final major site plan approval. Abraham Fayette. Address is 103, 105, 107 Monticello Avenue, Block 17906, Lots 25, 26, and 27' (3:51:01 to 3:51:31). The secretary announced 'nine resolutions' (3:48:26).
25 motion
Adjournment
'Motion for adjournment' (3:52:42), 'Motion' (3:52:45), 'Second' (3:52:46), speakers not named; no vote was taken; 'We are adjourned' (3:52:48). adjourned.t is the segment of the seconded motion; no clock time stated. Agenda item 24 (Executive Session) was not called.
Record drafted 2026-10-19, checked 2026-10-21, reviewed by Adam Hanford (review pending).