8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:30:28 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (1:30:28 segment, 1:30:29 word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2024-0099 as presented to the board with all staff recommendations and commissions.' (1:30:18) and 'Second.' (1:30:27, p 0.43); mover and seconder not named. Wick, Kaplan, Capers, Conaway 'Aye.' (1:30:31 to 1:30:38, p 1.00). Little, called as 'Councilperson Little?' (1:30:40): no answer heard; called again (1:30:47); 'Oh, I said aye. Maybe my mic wasn't close enough to my mouth. Sorry.' (1:30:49, 'aye' p 0.92; p 0.90 in the re-transcription without VAD of 1:30:28 to 1:31:05, which also hears no answer to the first call): recorded aye. Barnaby '... Aye.' (1:30:59, p 0.79; 0.91 re-transcription) after a comment on the building; Stamato 'Aye.' (1:31:01, p 1.00; in the re-transcription called as 'Nurse D'Amato' with 'Aye' at p 0.41, the same answer); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Nongadin' (1:31:03), 'Aye.' (1:31:04, p 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (1:31:05). No count announced. Patel absent (not called at the opening roll call; not heard at any point). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-25 (resolutions run 2026-10-17): as heard, unconfirmed.
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 4:37:42Consent roll call with items 17.1 to 17.13 (memorialization of resolutions, agenda item 17; 13 resolutions read 4:33:28 to 4:37:40 by a reader not named, 'we have 13 resolutions here this evening', 4:33:25). No motion heard apart from the reading; 'Do I have a second? Second.' (4:37:42 to 4:37:45, p 0.96); mover and seconder not named. Roll call from 'Vice Chair Patel?' (4:37:48, word timing): Patel 'Aye.' (4:37:49); Conaway 'Aye.' (4:37:51); Stamato 'Aye.' (4:37:52); Capers 'Aye.' (4:37:54); Kaplan 'Aye.' (4:37:55); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Congaden?' (4:37:56), 'Aye.' (4:37:57); every answer at p 1.00. 'Motion carries.' (4:37:57). No count announced. Heard: 6 ayes. Wick, Barnaby and Little are not called (absent as heard; see needs_checking, attendance). Every answer is heard, so the memorialization rule alone would publish this roll call; it is held until Adam decides how an aye from a member ineligible to memorialize is treated (see needs_checking, 17.1). No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-09-29 (resolutions run 2026-10-17). Eligibility: heard August 25, 2026 (planning-2026-08-25 item 12, 8-0, unconfirmed): Conaway, Stamato, Capers, Kaplan and Gangadin aye; Patel absent, and no certification heard. Patel answered aye here. Patel answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-08-25 item 12 (Approved 8-0, t 1:30:28)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-08-25 item 12 (Approved 8-0, t 1:30:28) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.