8-1 8 ayes, 1 nay, roll call at 3:06:45Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (3:06:45), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0068 as presented to the board ... with all stated conditions from the planning' (3:06:29); mover and seconder not named. Wick: 'I will vote yes.' (3:07:08, p 1.00). Barnaby, Kaplan, Patel 'Aye.' (p 0.96 to 1.00); Conaway 'No.' (3:07:21, p 0.98). Capers asked staff to go over the variances again (3:07:35; staff listed them from 3:07:39), then said 'I'm going to go aye' (3:08:26, p 0.70). Stamato and Little 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Gangadin: 'I'm going to vote aye.' (3:09:08, p 0.96). Heard: 8 ayes, 1 nay. Announced: 'Motion carries on a motion approved with conditions 8-4 and one against.' (3:09:09; '8' p 0.72, '-4' p 0.98, 'one' p 0.75), read as eight for and one against. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0068 on EnerGov (date of hearing July 28, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026; 'VOTE: 8-1', p. 8): Yes for Gangadin, Little, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Barnaby and Capers, No for Conaway (read from the page image; the extracted text misaligns the column).
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2025-0068 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/7e311bdb-ea27-4ced-bf5c-636025a755e1?tab=attachments), 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026' (copy read in _live/planning-2026-07-28.resolutions/). Eligibility: approved 8-1 at the July 28, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 9) with Conaway voting no; Conaway answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 9 (Approved 8-1, t 3:06:45)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-28 item 9 (Approved 8-1, t 3:06:45) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.