Meeting record
Planning Board, August 11, 2026
- Body
- Planning Board
- Date
- August 11, 2026 (regular meeting)
- Video
- city recording, 4h 1m
- Called to order
- 0:00:06 (5:31 p.m.)
- Adjourned
- 4:01:05
- Agenda
- data.jerseycitynj.gov
- Memorialized resolutions
- jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net
- Votes
- 14 confirmed, 4 as heard, unconfirmed
The Planning Board publishes no written minutes, so the votes and attendance on this page are as heard on the video and are marked unconfirmed until a memorialized resolution confirms them (see the
vote rule).
Attendance
Items
9 P2024-0240 case
Announced in correspondence in the 0:03:10 segment, the first of four carry requests (agenda page 8, new business item 9): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:03:47). The speaker giving correspondence is addressed as 'Cam' (0:05:12). No motion or vote was heard. Repeated for the public after item 7a (0:49:39 to 0:50:09, 'This matter will be heard on August 25th'). The agenda lists the case as carried from June 30, 2026.
14 P23-073 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:03:56 (agenda item 14): the applicant requested to carry with preservation of notice to August 25, 2026 (0:04:13 segment). No motion or vote was heard. Repeated for the public after item 13 ('As previously announced, Case P23-073 has been carried to August 25th', 1:50:31 segment, 1:51:08 word timing).
15 P2025-0255 case
Announced in correspondence in the 0:04:13 segment (agenda page 10, item 15): 'they are adjourning they will re-notice for the September 8th meeting of this year ... there will be new notice on that case'. Recorded as Carried to September 8, 2026 with new notice. No motion or vote was heard. Repeated for the public at 1:51:16 ('has been adjourned. The new date would be September 8th'); 'they will notice for that meeting' (1:51:42).
19 P2026-0108 case
Announced in correspondence at 0:04:47 as the last item (agenda page 11, item 19): 'requesting to carry with preservation of notice to our next meeting that is August 25th of this year'. 'And that concludes correspondence, Madam Chair.' No motion or vote was heard. Repeated for the public after item 17 (3:38:46 to 3:39:02). The amendments were not presented or discussed and the board made no recommendation on them. The agenda lists the case as carried from July 28, 2026.
6 other
Cases listed on the agenda as already carried (items 6a to 6w)
Listed on the agenda under '6. ADJOURNMENTS' as carried with preservation of notice to the August 25 meeting; not read on the video, which moved past them to old business at 0:05:12. Cases: 6a P2026-0023; 6b P2024-0008; 6c P2026-0049; 6d P2025-0270; 6e P2026-0047; 6f P2026-0025; 6g P2024-0099; 6h P2025-0172; 6i P2025-0138; 6j P2025-0239; 6k P2025-0240; 6l P2025-0186; 6m P2025-0246; 6n P2025-0253; 6o P2024-0106; 6p P2025-0160; 6q P23-043; 6r P2025-0228; 6s P2025-0004; 6t P2025-0161; 6u P2024-0198; 6v P2025-0169; 6w P2025-0244 (all to August 25, 2026). Agenda: https://data.jerseycitynj.gov/api/explore/v2.1/catalog/datasets/planning-board-agendas-2026/attachments/17_august_11_2026_mtg_v2pdf
7a P2025-0133 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 0:49:00Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick.' (0:49:00), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0133 as presented to the board with all noted staff and board conditions' (0:48:46 to 0:48:58); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. The answers rest on the full pass and the re-transcription without VAD of 0:48:55 to 0:50:10; each hears one answer the other misses and neither contradicts the other. Both passes: Wick 'I will vote aye.' (0:49:04, p 0.94); Kaplan, Patel, Stamato, Barnaby and Capers 'Aye.' (0:49:08 to 0:49:21, p 1.00). Conaway: 'Aye.' (0:49:24, p 1.00) in the full pass; no answer in the re-transcription, which goes from 'Commissioner Conaway.' (0:49:23) to 'And share gang it in.' (0:49:26). Gangadin, called 'And Chair Gangadin.' (0:49:26): the full pass breaks off at 0:49:36 and is unreadable (p 0.00 to 0.33) until item 9 at 0:50:05; the re-transcription has '... it's no detriment to the public. So my vote is aye.' (0:49:49, 'aye' p 0.94) and 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (0:49:51). Recorded: Conaway aye (full pass), Gangadin aye (re-transcription): 8-0. Little absent. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0133 on EnerGov (dates of hearing June 9, June 30, July 28 and August 11, 2026; memorialized August 11, 2026), p. 8: Yes for Gangadin, Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Barnaby, Conaway and Capers; no tally printed ('VOTE:' blank), 8-0 counted from the table (marked as counted, Adam 2026-10-16); Little not listed (the resolution's vote table does not list Commissioner Little; absent as heard). Outcome, tally and every member agree. Eligibility: the chair said every commissioner attending was present at the previous hearing (0:05:12 segment). The board memorialized this resolution later in this meeting (item 20.9).
- 0:06:57 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the board had asked in June for changes to trash circulation, that trash would now be handled inside the buildings, and that the North Tower hotel unit count was reduced by three (0:08:22); the application was re-noticed (A7, 0:09:38).
- 0:11:27 Applicant: The project architect described trash moving from the South Tower to the North Tower on the third floor by service corridor and elevator, with containers brought out within 10 minutes of the truck's arrival (0:13:50).
- 0:18:51 Applicant: The applicant's planner described two 47-storey towers with 1,514 units, 86 and 66 of them affordable (0:22:51), listed the requested deviations for setbacks, retail depth, non-retail frontage, street trees and loading, and argued them under the c(2) test (0:28:19).
- 0:34:20 Public: A member of the public spoke on the income mix of the affordable units, the share of studio units and construction jobs.
- 0:42:31 Staff: Staff explained the plan's affordable housing accommodation (5,000 square feet per affordable unit, up to 20 more storeys), listed seven staff conditions and board conditions on a trash easement, 10-minute pickup and curb extensions (0:46:47), and recommended approval (0:48:24).
Old business item a, called at 0:05:12 ('This matter has been heard'); the agenda lists it as carried with preservation of notice from June 30, 2026, testimony taken. Revised notice marked A7 (0:09:38); five photographs marked A8 (0:20:29). Before the vote a speaker not named stated that an approval would be conditioned on a reciprocal easement between the towers for trash and a 10-minute pickup (0:16:14); staff included both, with curb extensions, as board conditions, and the applicant agreed (0:47:59). The agenda gives Phase 1 as 863 units with 87 affordable; the planner said 860 and 86 (0:22:51), the applicant's attorney 152 affordable units in total (0:31:15), and the memorialized resolution gives 860 units with 86 affordable and 654 with 66 affordable (RESO P2025-0133 p. 1). Public portion opened at 0:33:00; one member of the public spoke (0:33:32 to 0:37:27); a second speaker wished to speak on item 16 and was told it had not been reached (0:38:12 to 0:38:56); closed in the 0:38:56 segment ('Public is closed'). Staff here is the speaker the chair asked to 'wrap the application up' as 'Matt' (0:42:26); the applicant's attorney referred to 'Mr. da Silva' (0:40:00), the review planner on the agenda; recorded as staff.
10 P2025-0266 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:08:35 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Wick.' (1:08:35), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0266 as presented to the board of this meeting with all staff conditions' (1:08:23); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Wick 'Aye.' (1:08:37, p 0.99); Stamato, called twice ('you're muted'), 'Aye.' (1:08:50, p 1.00); Patel and Barnaby 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Kaplan '... I move aye.' (1:09:03, 'aye' p 0.67); Capers, Conaway and Gangadin 'Aye.' (p 0.99 to 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (1:09:14). No count announced. Little absent. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-11 (resolutions run 2026-10-16): as heard, unconfirmed.
- 0:55:32 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application seeks three sign variances for a restaurant tenant: a blade sign projecting 3 feet 4 inches where 15 inches is allowed, window signs covering 31% where 20% is allowed, and two signs where one per storefront is allowed.
- 1:07:52 Ben Jordan (Planner, Division of City Planning): Called on as 'Our planner is Ben' (1:07:20 segment), agreed with the applicant's planner and recommended approval subject to the conditions in the staff memo dated June 30, 2026; the applicant agreed (1:08:18).
New business item 10, called in the 0:50:09 segment; the agenda lists it as carried from June 30, 2026 with preservation of notice. Notice marked A1 (0:51:53); one slide of photographs marked A2 (1:00:34). A question whether the illuminated signs would be lit only during business hours (0:58:14, speaker not named) was answered that the signs would be on a timer. Public portion opened and closed in the 1:07:20 segment ('Public is closed'); no member of the public spoke.
11 P2026-0018 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:28:32 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Commissioner Barnaby' (1:28:35, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2026-0018 as presented to the board with all staff recommendations and conditions' (1:28:23); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Barnaby 'Aye' (1:28:37, p 0.72); Kaplan, Patel, Conaway, Capers, Stamato, Wick and Gangadin 'Aye' (p 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor with conditions.' (1:29:03). No count announced. Little absent. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-11 (resolutions run 2026-10-16): as heard, unconfirmed.
- 1:11:15 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said window vinyl signs for the building's rebranding had been installed beyond what the redevelopment plan permits and that the application seeks approval for them, with any the board does not approve to be removed.
- 1:14:27 Applicant: The applicant's planner said the window decals total 102 square feet in about 38 individual elements, in addition to 29.3 square feet of signs approved earlier, where the Exchange Place North plan allows one sign of up to 50 square feet.
- 1:27:16 Cameron Black (Review Planner): Called on as 'Our planner, Cam?' (1:25:45), asked the applicant to agree to the staff memo dated June 3, agreed with the planning testimony and recommended approval with conditions; condition 1's certificate of occupancy reference is to be removed (1:28:11).
Called at 1:09:03 (P2026-0018, 200 Greene Street). Notice marked A1 (1:10:34); a two-slide signage exhibit dated June 4, 2026 marked A2 (1:14:05). The applicant's attorney introduced themself as 'Charles Harrington of Conaway' (1:10:44); 'Conaway' here is not Commissioner Conaway (see needs_checking, names). Public portion opened at 1:25:36 and closed at 1:25:45; a hand was then raised (1:25:48), a motion to reopen was made and seconded (1:26:10 to 1:26:16) with no roll call heard, the person did not accept the promotion, and a motion to close was made and seconded (1:27:05 to 1:27:08); no member of the public spoke. Questions from members not named: the signs' scale relative to the building (1:23:35) and whether the signage is permanent (1:25:18; the reply was that it is).
12 P2026-0013 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 1:35:31Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (1:35:31), after a motion 'to approve case P2026-0013 as presented to the board tonight with all staff conditions' (1:35:20); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Full pass: Wick 'Aye' (1:35:35, p 0.99); Stamato 'Aye' (1:35:37, p 1.00; a second 'Aye,' at 1:35:37 p 0.08); Patel: 'Commissioner Patel' (1:35:38) then 'Aye,' at p 0.02; Barnaby, Kaplan, Capers, Conaway and Gangadin 'Aye,' (p 0.97 to 0.99). Re-transcription without VAD of 1:35:31 to 1:35:56: the same order, every answer 'Aye.' at p 0.91 to 1.00, Patel 'Aye.' (1:35:39) at p 1.00. Recorded: Patel aye as heard in the re-transcription (the full pass is below 0.5, not a different answer); 8-0. 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (1:35:53). No count announced. Little absent. Second record: the resolution of P2026-0013 on EnerGov, p. 5: 'VOTE: 8-0', Yes for Gangadin, Wick, Stamato, Barnaby, Patel, Kaplan, Conaway and Capers; Little not listed (absent as heard). Its last page gives 'DATES OF HEARING' and 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION' with August 11, 2026 and August 25, 2026 below them in that order, and its recital says the hearing was carried to August 11, 2026 (p. 1); it is read here as this meeting's hearing (the resolutions script took August 11 as the memorialization date). Little is not listed (the resolution's vote table does not list Commissioner Little; absent as heard). Outcome, tally and every member agree.
- 1:30:28 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said a 50 by 100 foot lot would be divided into two conforming 25 by 100 foot lots with no variances, and that the one existing curb cut would serve one lot or be a shared driveway.
- 1:31:49 Andy Kaplan: Asked whether a neighbouring building encroaching on the lot affects the subdivision; the applicant's attorney said an easement is being arranged between neighbours (1:33:12), and the board attorney, answering 'Commissioner Kaplan' (1:33:39), concurred that it is a title matter.
- 1:34:36 Ben Jordan (Planner, Division of City Planning): Called on as 'our planner is Ben', said the subdivision creates two conforming lots and recommended approval with the conditions in the staff memo dated May 27, 2026 (1:35:03).
Called at 1:29:03 (read as 'B2026-0013'); the agenda lists it as carried from June 30, 2026 with preservation of notice. Notice marked A1 (1:29:58). Public portion opened at 1:34:23; no member of the public spoke; closed at 1:34:36 ('Public is closed'). After the vote the board took a break ('we'll be back at 7.20', 1:36:03 word timing) and was called back to order within the same segment ('Meeting back to order', 1:36:07 word timing); no recess motion was heard.
13 P2025-0257 case
8-0-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions, roll call at 1:50:31Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (1:50:35, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0257 as presented to the board tonight with all previous conditions from ... and the staff' (1:50:23 to 1:50:31); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Every answer 'Aye.' (p 0.92 to 1.00); Gangadin 'Aye.' (1:51:02, p 1.00). 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (1:51:04). No count announced. Little absent. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0257 on EnerGov (date of hearing August 11, 2026; memorialized August 25, 2026), p. 5: 'VOTE: 8-0-0', Yes for Gangadin, Wick, Patel, Conaway, Capers, Barnaby, Stamato and Kaplan; it approves the final major site plan amendment (p. 4). Little is not listed (absent as heard; the resolution's vote table does not list Commissioner Little).
- 1:36:35 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the amendment to the 2024 approval keeps the eight storeys, 69 units and 35 bicycle spaces, changes utility connections and interior layouts, and lowers the building by about nine feet through a change in construction type.
- 1:43:31 Applicant: The architect said a concrete structural system reduces the height from 90.6 feet, which needed a deviation where 85 feet is allowed, to 81 feet 10 inches, with floor-to-ceiling height unchanged at about nine feet (1:48:20), and that the rooftop indoor amenity space is removed.
- 1:49:51 Staff: Staff said the amendments remove the height variance and asked that all conditions of the previous approvals continue to apply; the applicant agreed (1:50:14).
Called in the 1:35:37 segment after the break (read as 'speed to 025-0257', 1:36:10 word timing). Notice marked A1 (1:38:08). Public portion opened at 1:49:35 after a reminder ('Public, Madam Chair', 1:49:30); no member of the public spoke; closed at 1:49:40. A question on floor-to-ceiling height (1:48:07) came from a speaker not named. Staff here is the speaker addressed as 'Matt' (1:49:43); the agenda's review planner is Matthew Da Silva; recorded as staff. After the vote the chair repeated the carries of P23-073 and P2025-0255 (1:51:08 to 1:51:42).
16 P2025-0125 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:06:42Roll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick' (3:06:48, word timing), 'hearing a motion made and seconded' (3:06:46). The motion: 'I'd like to make a motion to approve case P2025-0125 as presented to the board tonight' (3:05:23 to 3:05:57 segments); a speaker then addressed 'Vice Chair Wick' and said 'it's going to be a motion to recommend that the amendments to the redevelopment plan are consistent with the master plan' (3:05:57 segment); restated as 'a motion to approve the recommendations to the redevelopment plan and that they are consistent with the master plan' (3:06:25 to 3:06:39). motion_by rests on that address to Wick; 'Second' (3:06:41; p 0.01 full pass, 0.41 re-transcription) not named. Wick: 'Aye' (3:06:51) at p 0.47 in the full pass, below 0.5, and 'Aye.' at p 0.88 in the re-transcription without VAD of 3:06:42 to 3:07:00: aye as heard in the re-transcription. Capers 'Aye' (3:06:55, p 0.99; 0.98 re-transcription); Patel 'Aye' (3:06:59, p 1.00); Stamato, called as 'Commissioner Sabano' (3:07:01, 'Sabano' p 0.65; Stamato is the only member present not otherwise called), 'Aye' (3:07:02, p 1.00): recorded aye; Conaway 'Aye' (3:07:06, p 1.00); Barnaby '... so aye.' (3:07:20, p 0.93) after a comment on setbacks (3:07:09); Kaplan 'Aye.' (3:07:25, p 1.00); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gengenden' (3:07:27), '... is consistent with the master plan, so my vote is aye.' (3:07:45, p 1.00). Heard: 8 ayes. 'Motion carries. All in favor.' (3:07:49). No count announced. Little absent. Second record: the memorialized resolution of P2025-0125 on EnerGov (date of hearing August 11, 2026; memorialized August 25, 2026), p. 4: 'VOTE: 8–0', Yes for 'Vidya Gangdin, Chairwoman' (the signature block reads Vidya Gangadin), Stamato, Kaplan, Patel, Wick, Barnaby, Conaway and Capers; Little not listed (absent as heard). 'Gangdin' is a listed variant of Gangadin (members.json, 2026-10-16). Tally (8-0) and every member agree with the resolution. Held only on the action word: the resolution 'recommends approval by the City Council' and the record says Approved; see needs_checking (16). Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
- 1:55:10 Attorney: The petitioner's attorney said the amendments would permit apartments in place of required work-live units, require 15% affordable housing, at least 4,300 square feet for a Jersey City nonprofit arts use at nominal rent in perpetuity, and improvements at Warren and Morgan Streets; about 20 storeys.
- 1:59:44 Applicant: The petitioner's planner described the threshold requirements (15% affordable housing, a site of at least 12,500 square feet, nonprofit arts space), a 15 to 1 FAR and reduced upper-floor coverage, and said the amendments are consistent with the master plan (2:07:03).
- 2:07:48 Andy Kaplan: Asked that the reference to the Jersey City Traffic and Engineering Department in item E be corrected; staff took it as a floor amendment to read the Department of Infrastructure and Division of City Planning (2:08:34 to 2:08:51) and later attributed the change to Commissioner Kaplan (2:11:13).
- 2:09:13 Matt Ward (Supervising Planner, Division of City Planning): Staff said the arts space must go to a Jersey City 501(c)(3) found by public advertisement, with a room for free public use at least five hours a week subject to an agreement with the city, and that balconies facing a neighbouring property had been removed from the language (2:11:20).
- 3:01:53 Matt Ward (Supervising Planner, Division of City Planning): Staff described coverage limits of 90% (ground floor), 85% (second and third) and 80% (fourth floor up), said the proposed language is consistent with the master plan and staff would support recommending adoption by the City Council (3:04:33), and recommended approval (3:05:23).
Called at 1:51:47 (read as 'B2025-0125'); the agenda lists it as carried from July 14, 2026 with preservation of notice. The chair asked 'Matt, is this you?' (1:52:15); the speaker said they would give testimony after the petitioner's counsel; the board attorney referred to 'Mr. Ward' (1:54:52) and the petitioner's planner to 'Mr. Ward' (2:03:19); staff on this item is recorded as Matt Ward. The board attorney (not named here) said the proceeding is a statutory review in an advisory capacity of whether the proposed amendments are consistent with the master plan, with a recommendation to the Mayor and Council, not a site plan application (1:52:39 to 1:54:52), and repeated this after the public portion (2:58:12 to 3:00:07), adding that the governing body may amend the plan even if the board finds it inconsistent. The petitioner's attorney said the site is at the corner of Warren Street and Morgan Street (1:55:44). Floor amendment to the text: Department of Infrastructure and Division of City Planning (2:08:34 to 2:08:51; repeated by staff at 3:04:55). Public portion opened at 2:11:52; fourteen members of the public spoke (2:12:38 to 2:57:58; the transcript loses part of one speaker and the swearing-in of the next, 2:20:05 to 2:21:10); a motion to close the public portion and 'Public is closed' (2:58:06 to 2:58:11). The petitioner's attorney said the petitioner has an agreement in principle with the ownership of the neighbouring Morgan Lofts on their concerns, a site plan matter (3:00:22 to 3:01:29). A speaker not named disclosed on the record that their children had attended one week of camp at the Nimbus Arts Center with no financial consideration and said it was not a conflict (3:01:33); no recusal. The board's action: the motion as restated carried, recommending that the amendments are consistent with the master plan; no conditions were attached to the motion. No street number for the site is read on the video. The memorialized resolution (RESO P2025-0125, p. 3) finds the proposed amendments, 'including the floor amendments stated on the record', consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and the Master Plan and 'recommends approval by the City Council'; the action is recorded as Recommended (EDITORIAL.md section 5, adopted by Adam Hanford on 2026-10-18, replacing his earlier 'Approved is fine'). The restated motion was 'to approve the recommendations' (3:06:25).
17 P2025-0214 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:37:58 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary 'On a motion to approve with conditions' from 'Vice Chair Wick' (3:38:05, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2025-0214 as presented to the board with all staff recommendations and conditions' (3:37:47); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Wick 'Aye' (3:38:06, p 0.54); Capers, Patel, Stamato, Conaway, Barnaby 'Aye' (p 1.00); Kaplan 'Aye.' (3:38:33, p 0.98); Gangadin, called as 'Madam Chair Gingenden' (3:38:36), 'Aye.' (p 1.00). 'Motion carries all in favor for a motion to approve with conditions.' (3:38:39). No count announced. Little absent. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-11 (resolutions run 2026-10-16): as heard, unconfirmed.
- 3:08:30 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application had been re-noticed as a preliminary major site plan only, for a five-storey building with ground-floor retail and 44 units, no parking because no curb cut is permitted on Grand Street, and one variance for the rear yard.
- 3:18:32 Applicant: The architect said the building would have 2,041 square feet of commercial space and 34 bicycle spaces (3:20:00) and that 83 square feet per floor, 332 in total, extends into the required rear yard (3:19:39).
- 3:36:25 Staff: Staff said the listing should have been preliminary only, referred to the memo dated August 5, 2026, which the applicant accepted (3:36:53), and recommended approval with conditions under the c(1) and c(2) criteria.
Called in the 3:07:49 segment; the applicant's attorney asked for a five-minute break before starting and the chair agreed ('we'll be back at nine o'clock', 3:08:18); called back to order in the 3:08:18 segment (3:08:30 line); no recess motion was heard. The agenda lists preliminary and final approval; the attorney said the application and notice were changed to preliminary only and the applicant must return for final approval (3:08:50; 3:09:16). Notice marked A1 (3:09:16 segment). The planner gave the rear yard as 15.8 feet required and 10.7 feet at the minimum point (3:31:32). Two street trees are proposed with a contribution for two more because of utility poles (3:16:03, 3:17:10). Questions on street trees (3:17:04), a balcony rail and recycling (3:26:18) and trash pickup (3:35:24 segment) came from speakers not named. Public portion opened at 3:36:11; no member of the public spoke; closed at 3:36:22. Staff here is the speaker addressed as 'Matt?' (3:36:24); the agenda's review planner is Matt Ward; recorded as staff.
18 P2024-0195 case
Minor Site Plan with ‘c’ variances, 74 Tonnele Avenue
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:51:15 as heard, unconfirmedRoll call read by the secretary from 'Vice Chair Wick?' (3:51:17, word timing), after a motion 'to approve case P2024-0195 as presented to the board with all existing conditions stated by the staff' (3:50:48 segment); mover and seconder not named and no second heard. Wick 'Aye.' (3:51:19, p 0.98); Kaplan, Patel, Stamato 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Barnaby '... good work. Aye.' (3:51:32, p 1.00); Capers, Conaway 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Gangadin, called as 'Commissioner Gangadin' (3:51:41), '... My vote is aye.' (3:51:55, p 0.87). 'Motion carries with all in favor.' (3:51:58). No count announced. Little absent. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-11 (resolutions run 2026-10-16): as heard, unconfirmed.
- 3:40:09 Attorney: The applicant's attorney said the application converts an existing two-family building into four units within the existing structure, creates no new variances and does not intensify the existing side yard and rear yard nonconformities.
- 3:43:04 Applicant: The architect said lowering the grade makes the cellar a basement, so the three-storey building becomes four storeys without an addition, with an accessible unit on the lowest floor and trash and bicycle storage under the porch.
- 3:49:58 Matthew da Silva (Review Planner): Introduced as 'Matt Silva' (3:49:52), referred to the staff report dated August 6, 2026 with five conditions, which the applicant accepted (3:50:31), and recommended approval.
Called at 3:39:12 (read as 'KSP 2024-0195', address read as '740 Avenue', 3:39:24; '74 Tunnelly Avenue', 3:40:14). Notice marked A1 (3:40:26). The agenda gives the applicant's attorney as Bianca P. Pereiras and the review planner as Matthew da Silva; the staff speaker is recorded as official/dasilva-matthew from 'this is Matt Silva' (3:49:52); see needs_checking (names). A question on the fire escape (3:49:06) came from a speaker not named. Public portion opened at 3:49:44; no member of the public spoke; closed at 3:49:52 ('Public is closed').
20.1 P2024-0229 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:54:23Times in this note are word timings unless a segment is named. Consent roll call with items 20.1 and 20.2 (re-memorialization of two resolutions memorialized together on July 28, 2026, planning-2026-07-28 items 31.6 and 31.7). Before the roll call the reader (not named; 'Correct, Santa? Yes, Vice Chair Wick.', 3:52:22) said Commissioners Stamato, Capers and Conaway 'were ineligible to vote due to either a recusal or having not heard all of the testimony' and 'should recuse from voting on the memorializing resolution, and the record should so reflect' (3:53:13 to 3:53:49); they were not called. 'On a motion to memorialize' (3:53:57); a speaker asked for 'a first by vice chair wick' and a reply 'I'll do a first for approval or more memorialization' (3:54:04 to 3:54:14); 'second' (3:54:15) then 'thank you commissioner Katz' (3:54:19; 'Katz' p 0.30 full pass, 0.77 re-transcription; not in the dictionary, not settled). motion_by rests on that request to Wick. Roll call from 'commissioner Barnaby' (3:54:23): Barnaby 'aye' (3:54:25; p 0.72 full pass, 0.99 re-transcription without VAD of 3:54:15 to 3:54:50); Kaplan 'aye' (3:54:29; 0.92, 1.00); Patel 'aye' (3:54:35; 0.74, 1.00); Wick: 'Vice Chair Wick Aye' (3:54:42) with 'Aye' at p 0.03 in the full pass and p 1.00 in the re-transcription: aye as heard in the re-transcription; Gangadin 'Aye' (3:54:47; 0.99, 0.72). Stamato, Capers and Conaway not-voting (not called; ineligible as stated at 3:53:17, recorded under EDITORIAL.md section 4, eligibility; the reader's word was 'recuse'). Little absent. Heard: 5 ayes. Announced: 'that is five commissioners voting in favor as a quorum and that approves the memorialization of those two resolutions' (3:54:48). Memorialized: RESO P2024-0229 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/cda7b21a-b29f-44b6-b618-4ecb917f1af7?tab=attachments) and RESO P2024-0182 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments) on EnerGov, 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: July 28, 2026' and 'DATE OF RE-MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026'. Eligibility: their vote tables (P2024-0229 p. 10, P2024-0182 p. 24; 'VOTE: 5-1') list Gangadin, Wick, Little, Patel and Kaplan voting yes and Barnaby voting no, and do not list Stamato, Capers or Conaway; Barnaby answered aye here. Reading as heard (recorded): 5-0. Reading under the eligibility rule: Barnaby also not-voting, 4-0. Adam is deciding how eligibility applies when an ineligible member answers; see needs_checking (20.1). Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Agenda item 20, 'Memorialization of Resolutions', which lists no individual resolutions; the number 20.x is this record's order of reading. Memorialization was opened at 3:52:06 ('I think we have how many? Ten.'). Read at 3:52:29 to 3:52:50: 'Pulte Homes of New Jersey Limited Partnership for amended Port Liberty Master Plan approval, Block 27503, Block 15200, Chapel Ave, Case P2024-0229'; the reader said these resolutions had been memorialized 'in a block' last time and were re-memorialized 'out of an abundance of caution' (3:52:26 to 3:52:33). Memorialized at the July 28, 2026 meeting as planning-2026-07-28 item 31.6. Lot 15 and 200 Chapel Avenue as in that record's title.
20.2 P2024-0182 case
5-0 5 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:54:23Times in this note are word timings unless a segment is named. Consent roll call with items 20.1 and 20.2 (re-memorialization of two resolutions memorialized together on July 28, 2026, planning-2026-07-28 items 31.6 and 31.7). Before the roll call the reader (not named; 'Correct, Santa? Yes, Vice Chair Wick.', 3:52:22) said Commissioners Stamato, Capers and Conaway 'were ineligible to vote due to either a recusal or having not heard all of the testimony' and 'should recuse from voting on the memorializing resolution, and the record should so reflect' (3:53:13 to 3:53:49); they were not called. 'On a motion to memorialize' (3:53:57); a speaker asked for 'a first by vice chair wick' and a reply 'I'll do a first for approval or more memorialization' (3:54:04 to 3:54:14); 'second' (3:54:15) then 'thank you commissioner Katz' (3:54:19; 'Katz' p 0.30 full pass, 0.77 re-transcription; not in the dictionary, not settled). motion_by rests on that request to Wick. Roll call from 'commissioner Barnaby' (3:54:23): Barnaby 'aye' (3:54:25; p 0.72 full pass, 0.99 re-transcription without VAD of 3:54:15 to 3:54:50); Kaplan 'aye' (3:54:29; 0.92, 1.00); Patel 'aye' (3:54:35; 0.74, 1.00); Wick: 'Vice Chair Wick Aye' (3:54:42) with 'Aye' at p 0.03 in the full pass and p 1.00 in the re-transcription: aye as heard in the re-transcription; Gangadin 'Aye' (3:54:47; 0.99, 0.72). Stamato, Capers and Conaway not-voting (not called; ineligible as stated at 3:53:17, recorded under EDITORIAL.md section 4, eligibility; the reader's word was 'recuse'). Little absent. Heard: 5 ayes. Announced: 'that is five commissioners voting in favor as a quorum and that approves the memorialization of those two resolutions' (3:54:48). Memorialized: RESO P2024-0229 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/cda7b21a-b29f-44b6-b618-4ecb917f1af7?tab=attachments) and RESO P2024-0182 (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/9f17838d-a284-4f7d-b1e4-ae5e7e3f5e5f?tab=attachments) on EnerGov, 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: July 28, 2026' and 'DATE OF RE-MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026'. Eligibility: their vote tables (P2024-0229 p. 10, P2024-0182 p. 24; 'VOTE: 5-1') list Gangadin, Wick, Little, Patel and Kaplan voting yes and Barnaby voting no, and do not list Stamato, Capers or Conaway; Barnaby answered aye here. Reading as heard (recorded): 5-0. Reading under the eligibility rule: Barnaby also not-voting, 4-0. Adam is deciding how eligibility applies when an ineligible member answers; see needs_checking (20.1). Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The second resolution read (3:52:53 to 3:53:11): 'Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan Approval and Interim Use Approval, Lot 27503, Lot 15200, Chapel Avenue, Case P2024-0182'. Memorialized at the July 28, 2026 meeting as planning-2026-07-28 item 31.7; re-memorialized here with Stamato, Capers and Conaway not voting (see 20.1).
20.3 P2024-0088 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:56:01The reader said the denial resolution must be re-memorialized because 'Councilwoman Little was recused from the action' and should not have voted to memorialize it; Little was not present (3:55:30 to 3:55:45). Motion: 'I will approve the memorialization of the stated application.' (3:55:55), speaker not named; no second heard. Roll call 'On a motion to approve' from 'Commissioner Barnaby.' (3:56:05, word timing): Barnaby 'Aye.' (3:56:06) at p 0.34 in the full pass and p 0.02 in the re-transcription without VAD of 3:56:01 to 3:56:12, below 0.5 in both: not-voting. Kaplan asked whether it was 'a motion to deny' and was told 'It is a motion to memorialize the denying resolution', then 'Aye.' (3:56:19, p 1.00). Conaway, called three times, 'Aye. I was still on mute. Aye.' (3:56:33 to 3:56:35, p 0.92 and 1.00). Patel, Capers, Stamato, Wick 'Aye.' (p 1.00); Gangadin 'Aye.' (3:56:52, p 0.97). Little absent. Heard: 7 ayes (tally as heard). 'Okay, motion carries.' (3:56:54). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2024-0088 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/6006273b-4003-4fd4-81a2-7ca3925bfa30?tab=attachments), copies added 2026-08-19 marked 'Re-Memorialized: August 11, 2026' (p. 1, p. 22; text in _live/planning-2026-07-28.resolutions/). Eligibility (only members who voted for the action at the hearing may memorialize): its vote page (p. 22) lists Patel voting against the denial at the June 30, 2026 hearing; Capers, Conaway, Barnaby, Kaplan, Stamato, Wick and Gangadin in favor. Reading as heard (recorded): Patel aye, 7-0. Reading under the eligibility rule: Patel not-voting, 6-0. Adam is deciding how eligibility applies when an ineligible member answers; see needs_checking (20.3). Barnaby: answer as read by Adam Hanford on the video, or from the clerk's announced count where the audio is silent ('8-0. Barnaby is aye'). Published on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
The third resolution, read at 3:54:58 to 3:55:30: 'The applicant was Michael and Claudia Case', 87 Bright Street, Block 13905, Lot 12, case number P2024-0088; 'The original case was number P18-102'; 'This was a resolution to deny the amendment.' Memorialized at the July 28, 2026 meeting (planning-2026-07-28 item 31.1, where Little answered aye). RESO P2024-0088 gives the original case number as P18-120 (p. 1, p. 22); the reading here is P18-102.
20.4 P2024-0244 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2024-0244 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/0a28f41e-6838-4227-9b94-31ed20128873?tab=attachments), 'Memorialized on August 11, 2026' (copy read in _live/planning-2026-07-14.resolutions/). Eligibility: decided July 14, 2026 (read); Wick and Kaplan were absent from that hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 12, 7-0) and no certification is heard; each answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 12 (Approved 7-0, t 0:59:13)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 12 (Approved 7-0, t 0:59:13)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 12 (Approved 7-0, t 0:59:13) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:56:58 to 3:57:24: 'Case number P2024-0244, applicant 167-169, Newark Ave, Realty, LLC address 167-169, Newark Avenue ... Block 12704, Lot 14, decided on Tuesday, July 14th, 2026, memorialized on August 11th, 2026, Application for Preliminary and Final Major Site Plans.'
20.5 P2026-0064 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2026-0064 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/411716bd-5d86-4132-a650-75e45592f652?tab=attachments), 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026' (p. 5; copy read in _live/planning-2026-07-28.resolutions/). Eligibility: approved 7-2 at the July 28, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 7a; RESO p. 5) with Conaway and Barnaby voting no; both answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 7a (Approved 7-2, t 0:17:40)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Barnaby answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 7a (Approved 7-2, t 0:17:40)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-28 item 7a (Approved 7-2, t 0:17:40) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:57:29 to 3:57:46: 'the applicant Leon Tarrakis, JC, LLC for extension of preliminary and final major site plan approval with deviations 405 Route 440 Block 24602 Lot 1'; no case number was read with it. 'That's case number P2026-0064' was read later, after P2025-0068 (3:58:52); the number is assigned here by the address (planning-2026-07-28 item 7a, P2026-0064, 405 Route 440, whose resolution that record gives as memorialized August 11, 2026). RESO P2026-0064 (p. 1; memorialized August 11, 2026, p. 5) gives the case number with applicant Leontarakis JC LLC, 405 Route 440, Block 24602, Lot 1; the title's applicant name is from it.
20.6 P2026-0070 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. No resolution of this case uploaded to EnerGov since 2026-08-11 (resolutions run 2026-10-16). Eligibility: approved 7-0 at the July 14, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 11) with Wick and Kaplan absent; no certification is heard; each answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 11 (Approved 7-0, t 0:32:17)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 11 (Approved 7-0, t 0:32:17)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 11 (Approved 7-0, t 0:32:17) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:57:46 to 3:58:05: 'the applicant Jersey City Redevelopment Agency for minor subdivision approval with seed deviations 174 Newark Avenue Block 11401, Lot 13, Proposed Lots 13.01 and 13.02 ... Case Number P2026-0070.' No decision or memorialization date read.
20.7 P2025-0241 case
6-0 6 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: the joint resolution of P2025-0241 and P2025-0242 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/4ca5b553-59b8-49b8-ad03-f790dd6d663e?tab=attachments), 'Memorialized: August 11, 2026' (copies read in _live/planning-2026-07-14.resolutions/). Eligibility: P2025-0241 and P2025-0242 were each approved 7-0 at the July 14, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-14 items 19 and 20) with Wick and Kaplan absent; no certification is heard; each answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Wick answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 20 (Approved 7-0, t 3:28:29)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Kaplan answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-14 item 20 (Approved 7-0, t 3:28:29)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-14 item 20 (Approved 7-0, t 3:28:29) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:58:09 to 3:58:32: 'the City of Jersey City Planning Board in the matter of Sanitar, LLC, Application Number P2025-0241 and P2025-0242, decided July 14, 2026, memorialized August 11, 2026, application for minor subdivision approval and minor site plan approval.' One joint resolution for both cases (number here is the first). The applicant's name (Sanichar, LLC), 676 Summit Avenue, Block 6601, Lot 36 are from the resolution on EnerGov (_live/planning-2026-07-14.resolutions, P2025-0241 and P2025-0242 copies, p. 1), not read on the video.
20.8 P2025-0068 case
7-0 7 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2025-0068 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/7e311bdb-ea27-4ced-bf5c-636025a755e1?tab=attachments), 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026' (copy read in _live/planning-2026-07-28.resolutions/). Eligibility: approved 8-1 at the July 28, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 9) with Conaway voting no; Conaway answered aye here. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Conaway answered aye but did not vote for the action at the hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 9 (Approved 8-1, t 3:06:45)): not eligible to memorialize, recorded not-voting. Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-28 item 9 (Approved 8-1, t 3:06:45) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:58:33 to 3:58:50: 'the applicant NAMDAR Group, LLC, for preliminary and final major site plan with deviations, 597 Marin Boulevard, AK-166 14th Street ... Block 7104, Lot 3, that's case number P2025-0068.' No decision or memorialization date read.
20.9 P2025-0133 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2025-0133 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/ee49cd8f-61c6-4b87-a677-aafa563ff9db?tab=attachments), dates of hearing June 9, June 30, July 28 and August 11, 2026, 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026' (p. 8): memorialized the same night as the vote on the application (item 7a); its vote table is item 7a's roll call, not this one. Eligibility: the table lists all eight members present here voting yes; Gangadin's answer at item 7a is heard only in the re-transcription (0:49:49). Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Eligibility checked against the resolution's vote table (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/ee49cd8f-61c6-4b87-a677-aafa563ff9db?tab=attachments), no hearing record in data/meetings on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:58:57 to 3:59:26: 'applicant 547 Summit LLC for preliminary and final major site plan approval with deviations 9 and 11 Van Reitman Avenue, 547, 549, 551, 555, and 559 Summit Avenue and 594 Pavonian Avenue ... block 790. Lots 5678.01, aka 8, 9, 10, and 11. That's case number P2025-0133.' The block is read as '790'; RESO P2025-0133 (p. 1) gives applicant 547 SUMMIT LLC, Block 7904, Lots 5, 6, 7, 8.01 (a/k/a 8), 9, 10 and 11; the agenda names the applicant Homestead Market, LLC. No decision or memorialization date read; the resolution gives memorialization August 11, 2026 (p. 8). The resolution was memorialized at the same meeting at which the board voted on the application (item 7a).
20.10 P2025-0106 case
8-0 8 ayes, 0 nays, roll call at 3:59:52Consent roll call with items 20.4 to 20.10 (the rest of the resolutions, read 3:56:58 to 3:59:45). 'Can I get a second?' (3:59:49); 'Second.' (3:59:51, p 0.52), speaker not named; no motion heard apart from the reading. Roll call from 'Commissioner Barnaby?' (3:59:52, word timing): every member present answered 'Aye.' at p 0.99 to 1.00 (Barnaby 3:59:54, Kaplan 3:59:56, Conaway 3:59:59, Patel 4:00:02, Capers 4:00:04, Stamato 4:00:06, Wick 4:00:09, Gangadin 4:00:11). Little absent. 'Motion carries all in favor to memorialize resolutions.' (4:00:12). No count announced. Memorialized: RESO P2025-0106 on EnerGov (https://jerseycitynj-energovpub.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/plan/28bd08e9-a24f-4359-84ea-291210e3ade9?tab=attachments), 'DATE OF MEMORIALIZATION: August 11, 2026' (copy read in _live/planning-2026-07-28.resolutions/). Eligibility: approved 9-0 at the July 28, 2026 hearing (planning-2026-07-28 item 7b); every member present here voted for it then. Every answer here is heard; the item is held only because the roll call is shared with 20.4 to 20.9. Held with the other eligibility questions of this roll call; see needs_checking (20.4). Eligibility checked against planning-2026-07-28 item 7b (Approved 9-0, t 1:03:17) on Adam Hanford's decision of 2026-10-18.
Read at 3:59:28 to 3:59:45: 'And last is Applicant 342 Johnston Equities LLC Amendment to Final Major Site Plan Approval 342 Johnston Avenue ... Block 17506, Law 11, that's case number P2025-0106.' No decision or memorialization date read.
motion-adjourn motion
Adjournment
Agenda items 21 (Executive Session) and 22 (Adjournment). An announcement that the August 25 meeting is the last virtual meeting and the board returns in person on September 8 (4:00:15). 'Any executive sessions?' (4:00:43); 'No, ma'am.' (4:00:46); none was held. 'Motion to adjourn?' (4:00:59); 'Motion to adjourn.' (4:01:03) and 'A second.' (4:01:05), speakers not named; no vote is heard. adjourned.t is the seconded motion (Adam's rule, 2026-10-16); no clock time stated.
Corrected 2026-10-18: Item 16 (P2025-0125): Recommended.
LogRecord drafted 2026-10-16, checked 2026-10-16, reviewed by Adam Hanford 2026-10-18.